Main Article Content


As a form of assisted reproduction methods, surrogacy remains controversial today. The practice of using surrogates has been around for very long time and serves a wide variety of functions in countries all over the world. The purpose of this research is to ascertain whether or not surrogacy is permissible under the laws that have been enacted and are in effect in Indonesia to govern the processes involved in surrogacy. This research also intends to determine whether or not surrogacy is allowed in India and analyze the legislative framework of that country in comparison to that of Indonesia. The type of research is normative legal research which relies on secondary data, in the form of legal material especially primary and secondary legal materials. This normative legal research employs both statutory and comparative approaches. Comparison is made between Indonesia and India. It is found that India has legalized the practice of surrogacy since long time ago. In addition, surrogacy in India does not only serve the reproductive purpose but also commercial purpose. On the other side, although the practices of surrogacy are also found in Indonesia, however, it remains illegal so far in this country.


Surrogacy Comparative law Indonesia India

Article Details

How to Cite
Susila, M. E., & Morgan, K. R. (2022). COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF SURROGACY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND INDIA. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 114-126.


  1. Journal
  2. Aulia, Ulfah. "A Family for All: Legalization of Surrogacy in Indonesia." PhD diss., Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2020.
  3. Chawla, Anjali. "Applicability and Legality of the Commercial Surrogacy." Journal of Global
  4. Studies (JGS): 118.
  5. Drabiak, Katherine, Carole Wegner, Valita Fredland, and Paul R. Helft. "Ethics, law, and
  6. commercial surrogacy: a call for uniformity." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35,
  7. no. 2 (2007): 300-309.
  8. Muhammad Djumhana, Hukum dalam Perkembangan Bioteknologi, (Citra Aditya Bakti
  9. 1995). [163]
  10. Ratman, H. D. (2012). Surrogate Mother dalam Perspektif Etika dan Hukum: Bolehkah Sewa
  11. Rahim di Indonesia? Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia
  12. Rizka, Rizka, and Rozanah Ab Rahman. "LEGALITY OF SURROGACY IN INDONESIA
  13. BASED ON TRANSCENDENTAL VALUES." European Journal of Molecular &
  14. Clinical Medicine 7, no. 10: 2020.
  15. Sanjaya A. W. (2016). Aspek Hukum Sewa Rahim (Surrogate Mother) Dalam Perspektif
  16. Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana. Rechtens Journal,5(2). 36-47.
  17. Spivack, C. The Law of the Surrogate Motherhood in the United State. 58 AJCL. Oklahoma:
  18. Oklahoma City University School of Law, 2010.
  19. Internet
  20. Aditya Mishra, Surrogacy in Indian Legal Context- A Bliss or Curse, volume no Manu
  21. 11,42(2015),
  22. 47DC-B73E-5F5F43D3E8F8.pdf> [Accessed 26 July 2022].
  23. Anil Malhotra, Draft surrogacy bill violates the fundamental right of people to choose
  24. modes of parenthood, THE INDIAN EXPRESS [Accessed 26 July 2022]
  25. Roksandić Vidlička, S., Hrstić, D. and Kirin, Z., 2012. Bioethical and legal challenges of
  26. surrogate motherhood in the Republic of Croatia. [online] Available at:
  27. [Accessed 29 July 2022].
  28. Sensible Surrogacy. Surrogacy In The UK. Available from:
  29. [Accessed 25 July 2022].
  30. The Surrogacy Experience. Surrogacy Laws. Available from:
  31., [Accessed 27 July 2022].
  32. Regulation
  33. Act of the Republic of Indonesia No. 36 of 2009 on Health.
  34. ART (Regulation) Bill- 2010 [Accessed 30 July 2022]
  35. INDIA CONSTITUTION. Art. 14, Cl. 1.
  36. Indonesia Civil Code (Kitab undang-undang hukum perdata)
  37. Regulation of Health Minister Number 39/Menkes/SK/I/2010 concerning Organizing
  38. Artificial Reproduction Technology Services.