Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 13, 2022
Accepted
Mar 31, 2024
Published
Mar 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 589 Download : 376

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper, which uses an interdisciplinary, historical, and literary approach, aims to answer the questions of how the process of discussing changes to Article 33 of the Indonesian constitution led to the formulation of the article as it is known today. Second, how did the amendment of Article 33 of the Indonesian Constitution pave the way for the emergence of neoliberal legal products in Indonesia? Third, how is the democratic economic system (sistem ekonomi kerakyatan), as an economic system with a strong historical and constitutional foundation in Indonesia, affirmed by the deviationist doctrine from the perspective of critical legal studies (CLS)? This paper discusses the debates that took place in the agenda to amend Article 33 of the Indonesian constitution as the background of today's anomie. From a CLS perspective, the inclusion of the concept of efficiency in Article 33 of the Indonesian constitution after the amendment shows the infiltration of neoliberalism into Indonesia's basic law, riding on the political and legal reform agenda after the collapse of the authoritarian regime. To counter the excesses of neoliberalism, a legal scholar in the CLS perspective can engage in radical legal practice centred on the deviationist doctrine by, among other things, tracing legal principles back to their roots. Based on the deviationist doctrine, the formulation of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution is a credo of political economy as well as the original legal policy of a sovereign, anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist independent state, and therefore cannot be arbitrarily changed and/or abolished.

Keywords

critical legal studies democratic economic system the amendment of the indonesian constitution

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Atmaja, A. E., & Erliyana, A. (2024). Affirming the Democratic Economic System After the Amendment of Article 33 of the Indonesian Constitution: A Critical Legal Studies Perspective. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 8(2), 158-176. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v8i2.1084
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anggoro, Syahriza Alkohir. “Rule of Law, Neoliberalisme dan Proyek Reformasi Hukum World Bank: Perspektif Critical Legal Studies”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 50, No. 1 (2020).
  2. Anugroho, Adhi, Ratih Lestarini, dan Tri Hayati. “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Asas Efisiensi Berkeadilan berdasarkan Pasal 33 Ayat (4) UUD 1945 dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Bidang Ketenagalistrikan”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2017).
  3. Brotosusilo, Agus. “The Economic Analysis of Law” (materi kuliah Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia yang merupakan ringkasan dari makalah yang disajikan pada pertemuan ilmiah tentang analisis ekonomi terhadap hukum dalam era globalisasi yang diselengarakan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman RI, 1996).
  4. Butt, Simon dan Fritz Edward Siregar. “Analisis Kritik terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012”, Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2013).
  5. Collins, Hugh. “Roberto Unger and the Critical Legal Studies Movement”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 14, No. 4 (1987).
  6. Duménil, Gérard dan Dominique Lévy. “The Neoliberal (Counter-)Revolution” dalam Alfredo Saad-Filho dan Deborah Johnston, eds., Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader (London: Pluto Press, 2005).
  7. Fakih, Farabi. Authoritarian Modernization in Indonesia’s Early Independence Period: The Foundation of the New Order State (1950–1965) (Koninklijke Brill: Leiden, 2020).
  8. Hanson, Sharon. Legal Method (London: Cavendish Publishing, 1999).
  9. Liddle, R. William. “The Relative Autonomy of the Third World Politician: Soeharto and Indonesian Economic Development in Comparative Perspective”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1991).
  10. Matsumoto, Yasuyuki. Financial Fragility and Instability in Indonesia (New York: Routledge, 2007).
  11. Nongtji, Bustamin. “Konsep Efisiensi Berkeadilan dalam Demokrasi Ekonomi menurut Pasal 33 Ayat (4) UUD NRI 1945 dalam Perspektif Perlindungan bagi Usaha Kecil”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 42, No. 2 (2013).
  12. Prianto, Andi Luhur. “Good Governance dan Formasi Kebijakan Publik Neo-Liberal”, Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2011).
  13. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum [Cetakan ke-6] (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006).
  14. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Membangun dan Merombak Hukum Indonesia: Suatu Pendekatan Lintas Disiplin (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009).
  15. Ruslina, Elli. “Makna Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 dalam Pembangunan Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 9, Nomor 1 (2012).
  16. Septaningrum, Indriaswari Dyah. “Jejak Neoliberalisme dalam Perkembangan Hukum Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Jentera, Edisi Khusus (2008).
  17. Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. “Eksistensi Penjelasan UUD 1945 Pasca Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945”, Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 49 (2005).
  18. Swasono, Sri-Edi. “Demokrasi Ekonomi: Komitmen dan Pembangunan Indonesia” (Pidato pada Upacara Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Ilmu Ekonomi pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, 1988).
  19. Swasono, Sri-Edi. “Kebangsaan dan Kerakyatan: Doktrin Pembangunan Nasional Indonesia”, Kesejahteraan Sosial: Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2014).
  20. Tim Penyusun Naskah Komprehensif Proses dan Hasil Perubahan UUD 1945. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan, 1999–2002 [Buku VII: Keuangan, Perekonomian Nasional, dan Kesejahteraan Sosial] (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010).
  21. Tushnet, Mark. “Critical Legal Studies: A Political History”, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 100, No. 5 (1991).
  22. Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. “The Critical Legal Studies Movement”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 96, No. 3 (1983).
  23. Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. The Critical Legal Studies Movement (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1986).