Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 25, 2023
Accepted
May 5, 2024
Published
Mar 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 228 Download : 223

Main Article Content

Abstract

Recognizing and enforcing a foreign arbitral award has been becoming a global issue. To solve such an issue, the New York Convention 1958 turns out to be an important international legal product regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards worldwide. States ratifying the convention are internationally bound to respect and assist in the execution of a foreign arbitration award in their respective countries; Indonesia is one of them. It ratified the convention by Presidential Decree Number 34 of 1981. Nonetheless, there is an impression that Indonesia has not implemented the convention consistently, compared to countries that are, considered, friendly to foreign arbitration awards due to the facts that there are several foreign arbitral awards that have been rejected by the District Court. This impression, however, needs to be re-examined by understanding textually the norm formula in the 1958 New York Convention and comparing its implementation among Indonesia and several countries that are considered friendly to foreign arbitration awards. This paper finds that there is a norm formula in the 1958 New York Convention that opens space for ratification countries not to always recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards in the executing country of the award.

Keywords

arbitration arbitral award enforcement international civil law recognition

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Taqwa, M. D., Laksmi Prabhaswari, A., & Putri Subiyanto, M. J. (2024). Inconsistency in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Non-Compliance or Normative Factors?. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 8(2), 258-175. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v8i2.1310
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Buku
  2. Asgeirsson, Hrafn. The Nature And Value of Vagueness In The Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020.
  3. Caenegem., R.C. Van. An Historical Introduction to Private Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  4. Harjono, Dhaniswara K. Hukum Penanaman Modal. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2007.
  5. Saija, Ronald. Buku Ajar Hukum Perdata Internasional. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2019.
  6. Soemartono, Gatot. Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006.
  7. Jurnal
  8. Bonomi, A. dan E. Reymond-Eniaeva. “Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Switzerland in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.” Ius Comparatum-Global Studies in Comparative Law 23 (2017).
  9. Brock, D. “Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award.” The Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance: Commentary and Annotations (2003).
  10. Choong, J dan R Weeramantry. “Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award.” The Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance: Commentary and Annotations (2003).
  11. Christie, George C. “Vagueness and Legal Language.” Minnesota Law Review 48 (1964).
  12. Gama Jr., Lauro dan Bruno Teixeira. “Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Brazil in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.” Ius Comparatum-Global Studies in Comparative Law 23 (2017).
  13. Girsberger/Voser, at N 1152; Berger B, Kellerhals, F, International and Domestic Arbitration in Switzerland (2nd ed, Stämpfli, Berne 2010), at N 1895 (hereinafter “Berger/Kellerhals”) in Girsberger, D. & Voser, N., International Arbitration in Switzerland, 2nd ed., Zurich 2012.
  14. Junita, Fifi. “‘Pro Enforcement Bias’ under Article V of the New York Convention in International Commercial Arbitration: Comparative Overview.” Indonesian Law Review Vol. 2 (2015).
  15. Latief, A. M. I., Sumardi, J., & Sakharina, I. K. . (2023). Kedaulatan Hukum Nasional dalam Putusan Arbitrase Internasional: Sengketa Negara Versus Pihak Swasta . Amanna Gappa, 31(1), 57-69, h.58, Retrieved from http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/agjl/article/view/26139.
  16. Mo, John Shijian. “Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in China.” Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
  17. Parlemen Singapura. “Arbitration (Foreign Awards) Bill.” Singapore Parliamentary Reports (Hansard) Vol. 48 (Agustus 1986).
  18. Rajagukguk, Erman. “Implementation of the 1958 New York Convention in Several Asian Countries: The Refusal of Foreign Arbitral Awards Enforcement on the Grounds of Public Policy.” Indonesian Journal of International Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (Januari 2008).
  19. Rubins, Noah. “The Enforcement and Annulment of International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia.” American University International Law Review 20 (2005).
  20. Sharma, Rajesh dan Suraj Sajnani. “Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Hong Kong.” Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (2017).
  21. Mustill, M. “Arbitration: History and Background.” Journal of International Arbitration 6 (1989).
  22. Wagian, Diangsa dan M. Yazid Fathoni. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontraktual Pemerintah Melalui Arbitrase Internasional dan berbagai Permasalahannya.” Jurnal IUS 2 (Desember 2014).
  23. World Arbitration and Mediation Report. “Arbitration in Singapore: The Establishment of A Legal Framework to Support International Arbitration.” JURIS Arbitration Law, Vol. 10 (1999).
  24. Xia, Xiaohong. “Implementation of the New York Convention in China.” International Commercial Arbitration Brief Vol. 1 (2020).
  25. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan/Putusan Pengadilan/Konvensi Internasional
  26. Brazil. Brazil Arbitration Act, Law No. 9.307. Undang-Undang Arbitrase.
  27. Court of Appeal. CA Paris 19 March 2013, Rev.arb. 2013.
  28. Court of Appeal. CA Paris 27 June 2002, Rev.arb. 2003.
  29. China. Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Undang-Undang Acara Perdata 1991.
  30. High Court of Singapore. PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2010] SGHC 2022.
  31. Hong Kong. Arbitration Ordinance Cap 609 of the Laws of Hong Kong, Undang-Undang Arbitrase Hong Kong 2011.
  32. Hong Kong Court of First Instanse, Astro Nusantara International BV and others v PT Ayunda Prima Mitra and others (HCCT 45/2010) Court of First Instance (21 March 2012).
  33. Hong Kong Electronic Sitation, Gao Haiyan vs. Keeneye Holdings Ltd [2010] HKEC 1694.
  34. Indonesia. Keputusan Presiden Tentang Penangguhan/Pengkajian Kembali Proyek Pemerintah Badan Usaha Milik negara, Dan Swasta Yang Berkaitan Dengan Pemerintah/Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Keppres No. 39/1997 dan Keputusan Presiden Tentang Pencabutan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 47/1997 Tentang Perubahan Status Pelaksanaan Beberapa Proyek Pemerintah, Badan Usaha Milik Negara dan Swasta Yang Berkaitan Dengan Pemerintah/Badan Usaha Milik Negara Yang Semula Ditangguhkan Atau Dikaji Kembali, Keputusan Presiden No. 5/1998.
  35. Inggris. Arbitration Act. Undang-Undang Tahun 1996.
  36. Konvensi Jenewa 1927 tentang Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
  37. Perancis. Code de Procédure Civile. Undang-Undang Arbitrase Perancis 2011.
  38. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan No. 86/Pdt.G./2002/PN.JKT.PST.
  39. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. Putusan No.736/Pdt/G/VI/1998/PN.JKT.PST.
  40. Singapura. International Arbitration Act. Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 1994.
  41. The Superior Court of Justice. Superior Tribunal de Justiça.
  42. Seminar
  43. Ganie, Idwan. “Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Indonesia.” disampaikan pada Joint Seminar of BANI and IArbI Regional Arbitral Institutes Forum Enhancing Regional Arbitration Cooperation: Emerging and Current Issues (2018).
  44. Disertasi
  45. Tuegeh-Longdong, Tineke Louise. “Pelaksanaan Konvensi New York 1958: Suatu Tinjauan Putusan Atas Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Pengadilan Luar Negeri Mengenai Ketertiban Umum.” Disertasi. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana FH UI, 1997.
  46. Naskah Internet
  47. CMS Law. “International Arbitration and Rules in France,” https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-international-arbitration/france. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  48. CMS Law. “International Arbitration Law and Rules in Switzerland.” https://cms.law/en/int/expert-guides/cms-expert-guide-to-international-arbitration/switzerland. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  49. Detlev Kühner. “Annulment and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in France.”
  50. Law Senate. “London Court of International Arbitration.” https://www.lawsenate.com/international-arbitration/lcia-international-arbitration. Diakses 7 Mei 2022.
  51. L O Baptista Advogados. “Brazil: STJ Denies Application for Recognition of Foreign Arbitral Award Declared Null at The Seat.” https://www.mondaq.com/brazil/trials-appeals-compensation/462134/stj-denies-application-for-recognition-of-foreign-arbitral-award-declared-null-at-the-seat. Diakses 14 April 2023
  52. Mundi, Jus. Maximov v. Novolipetsky (NLMK). https://jusmundi.com/fr/document/decision/en-nikolay-viktorovich-maximov-v-ojsc-novolipetsky-metallurgichesky-kombinat-judgment-of-the-hight-court-of-justice-of-england-and-wales-2017-ewhc-1911-thursday-27th-july-2017. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  53. New York Convention Guide. “Brazil-Jurisdiction.” https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=cmspage&pageid=11&menu=565&opac_view=-1. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  54. New York Convention Guide, “France - Jurisdictions”, ”https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=cmspage&pageid=11&menu=575&opac_view=-1. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  55. New York Convention Guide. “Switzerland – Jurisdiction.” https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=cmspage&pageid=11&menu=611&opac_view=-1. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  56. New York Convention Guide. “United Kingdom: Date of Accession and Date of Entry into Force.” https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1742. Diakses 27 Februari 2023.
  57. Ningbo Intermediate Court of Zhejiang Province. “Decision of 22 April 2009, 4 (2008) Yong Zhong Jian Zi.” https://newyorkconvention1958.org/index.php?lvl=concept_see&id=60&page=9&nbr_lignes=399&l_typdoc=. Diakses pada 19 Agustus 2022.
  58. Pinsolle, Philippe dan Alexis Mourre. “DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DE L’AVIATION CIVILE DE L’EMIRAT DE DUBAÏ v. INTERNATIONAL BECHTEL CO., LLP (The “DAC Dubai v. Bechtel” Case).” International Arbitration Court Decisions - 3rd Edition. https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/france-la-direction-g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale-de-l%E2%80%99aviation-civile-de-l%E2%80%99emirat-de-duba%C3%AF-v-international. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  59. Reuters, Thomson. “Arbitration Procedures and Practice in Singapore: Overview.” https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/. Diakses 7 Mei 2022.
  60. Reuters, Thomson. “Arbitration Procedures and Practice in Switzerland.” https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-502-1047?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true#co_anchor_a444248. Diakses 14 April 2023.
  61. SIAC. “Facts & Figures.” https://www.siac.org.sg/64-why-siac/150-facts-figures. Diakses 7 Mei 2022.