Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 19, 2023
Accepted
Mar 31, 2024
Published
Mar 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 196 Download : 171

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia's environmental justice system currently does not provide environmental law objectively. The philosophy, paradigm, approach, and objectives of environmental law as a regulatory basis are not applied by judges as intended by environmental law theories and concepts. This article aims to find an ideal environmental justice model. By applying a normative-empirical approach and a comparative method, as well as being based on qualitative juridical analysis, this article explores the values and principles contained in the local wisdom of indigenous communities that are relevant to becoming the basis for an environmental court model. This article concludes that the main problem that hampers environmental law enforcement at the court level is that the philosophy, paradigm, and methods of environmental law are marginalized due to the barriers of civil, criminal, and state administrative law regimes. The ideal environmental justice model is one that is based on the local wisdom values of indigenous communities, where environmental courts should be integrated, judged by certified competent judges, independent, and able to accommodate core environmental law theories and concepts.


 

Keywords

customary law environmental justice environmental law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Imamulhadi, I., Idris, I., & Nuriyah H., E. (2024). Environmental Justice Framework Based on Local Wisdom Model. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 8(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v8i2.1456
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
  2. Buku
  3. JCT Simorangkir, dkk, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.
  4. Munadjat Danusaputro, Hukum Lingkungan, Jakarta: Bina Cipta, 1981.
  5. Otto Soemarwoto, Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University, 2009.
  6. Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Alumni, 1986.
  7. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  8. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
  9. Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang.
  10. Dokumen Lainnya
  11. Aju Putrijanti dan Irma Cahyaningtyas, “Environmental Court And Principle Of Good Environmental Governance In Enforcing Environmental Law”, Varia Justicia, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2023.
  12. Angus MacInnes, “Menggerogoti Jantung Kalimantan: Rencana untuk Menjarah Sisa Perbatasannya”, Forest Peoples Programme, 2020, https://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/default/files/documents/Breaking-the-heart-of-Borneo-BAH-digital%20amended%2030%20Nov.pdf.
  13. Danielle Korngold, “Gjakmarrja as Conlict the Potential for Informal Peace Education in Albania”, Working Paper, Columbia University, 2016.
  14. Deni Satria, “Penerapan Hukum Adat Dayak Kanayatn dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Hukum Pidana di Kabupaten Landak dan Dasar Pemikiran Upaya Pengaturannya ke dalam Peraturan Daerah, Tesis, Universitas Tanjungpura, (tanpa tahun).
  15. Domenico Amirante, “Environmental Courts in Comparative Perspective: Preliminary Reflections on the National Green Tribunal of India”, Pace Environmental Law Review, Vol. 29, 2012.
  16. Francis Kariuki, “African Traditional Justice System”, Strathmore University Law School, 2018.
  17. Franky Butar-Butar, “Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan di Bidang Pertambangan”, Yuridika, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2010.
  18. George Pring dan Catherine Pring, “Environmental Courts and Tribunal: A Guide for Policy Maker”, United Nations Environment Programme, 2016, https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/10001/environmental-courts-tribunals.pdf.
  19. Hari Suroto, “Makna Upacara Bakar Batu Suku Dani”, Jubi, 2019, https://arsip.jubi.id/makna-upacara-bakar-batu-suku-dani/.
  20. Helen Kopnina, “Evaluating Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): Using Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes Toward the Sustainable Development (EAATSD) Scale”, Environmental Sustainable Development, Vol. 15, 2013.
  21. I Ketut Sudantra, dkk, “Sistem Peradilan Adat dalam Kesatuan-Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Desa Pakraman Bali, Jurnal Kajian Bali, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2017.
  22. ICLRE, “Peradilan Adat: Keadilan yang Ternafikan”, 2013, hlm 2-3, http://lbbt.or,id/index.php/publikasi/opini.
  23. Imamulhadi, “Aspek Hukum Penataan Ruang: Perkembangan, Ruang Lingkup, Asas, dan Norma”, Jurnal Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2021.
  24. Indah Nur Shanty Saleh dan Bita Gadsia Spaltani, “Environmental Judge Certification in an Effort to Realize the Green Legislation Concept in Indonesia”, Law and Justice, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2021.
  25. Jawadir Kadir, “How Can the Traditional Justice System Help Resolve Conflicts between India and Pakistan”, Lancester University, 2018.
  26. Lusiana Tijow, “Kebijakan Hukum Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia”, Artikel Penelitian, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, 2013.
  27. M. Daud Silalahi, “Lingkungan Sebagai Subjek Hukum dan Kewenangan Publik LSM Lingkungan”, disampaikan dalam diskusi “Masalah Prosedure dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan, Kerjasama Sekretariat Kerjasama Relevan Pengadilan Pencemaran dan Majalah Hukum dan Pembangunan, Jakarta, 1989.
  28. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, “Daftar Hakim Peradilan Umum yang telah Memperoleh Sertifikat Lingkungan”, https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/berita/pengumuman-surat-dinas/2895-daftar-hakim-peradilan-umum-yang-telah-memperoleh-sertifikat-lingkungan.html.
  29. Michael Coyle, “Traditional Indian Justice: A Role For The Present?”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1986.
  30. Muhar Junef dan Moh. Husain, “Pembentukan Pengadilan Khusus Lingkungan Sebagai Wujud Tanggung Jawab Negara pada Upaya Keadilan Ekologis”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2021.
  31. Nur Iftitah Isnantiana, “Hukum dan Sistem Hukum Sebagai Pilar Negara”, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2019.
  32. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 651K/Pdt/2015.
  33. Raonigel Talu Maraga, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah di Lingkungan Masyarakat Adat Dayak Kanayatn Kecamatan Menyuke Kabupaten Landak Provinsi Kalimantan Barat”, Tesis, Universitas Diponegoro, 2007.
  34. Sara Ida Magdalena Awi, “Para-Para Adat Sebagai Lembaga Peradilan Adat Pada Masyarakat Hukum Adat Port Numbay di Kota Jayapura”, Tesis, Universitas Udayana, 2012.
  35. Scott C. Whitney, “The Case for Creating a Special Environmental Court System”, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1973.
  36. Sutoyo, Paradigma Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup, Jurnal Hukum Adil, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013.
  37. Suzanna Pratt, “Gjakmarrja: Albanian Blood Feud and Restorative of Traditional Law”, Working Paper, 2013.
  38. United Nations Human Right, “Human Right and Traditional Justice System in Africa”, 2016.
  39. Wahyu Risaldi, dkk, “Penerapan Asas In Dubio Pro Natura dan In Dubio Pro Reo oleh Hakim Perkara Lingkungan Hidup”, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2018.
  40. WSSD, “the 2002 Johannesburg Principles on the Role of Law and Sustainable Development”, Afrika Selatan, 2002, https://www.eufje.org/images/DocDivers/Johannesburg%20Principles.pdf.
  41. Yohanes Bahari, “Model Resolusi Konflik Berbasis Pranata Adat pada Masyarakat Adat Dayak Pranayatn Di Kalimantan Barat”, Jurnal Wawasan, Vol. 13, 2007.