The Armed Conflict in Ukraine: Use of Force, Prosecution, and Complicity
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the early hours of Thursday, 24 February 2022, President Vladimir Putin addressed the Russian people and declared to the world that Russia has decided to commence a “special military operation” against Ukraine. Shortly afterwards, the Russian military entered Ukrainian territory from many parts of the country. The conflict has resulted in heavy casualties, especially within the Ukrainians. The international community has condemned the invasion, stating that it violates Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, and it’s contrary to the principles embodied in the Charter of the United Nations (UN Charter). The North Atlantic Council has also identified the attack as “a grave violation of international law, including the UN Charter.
In the wake of protests sounded by the international community, Russia has continued to oppose such arguments. As a preliminary analysis, it is evident that Russia’s actions against Ukraine consist of elements of force. Rather than denying the allegations, Russia has justified its use of force by referring to principles of international law. This paper examines a brief background of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, Russia’s and Ukraine’s justifications in the war, the possible prosecution of high-ranking Russian officials in potential fora’s, and also Belarus’ involvement in the conflict. While this paper finds that Russia’s justifications for their invasion are unlawful and invokes their responsibility, there are obstacles in prosecuting the crimes. It also considers that Belarus is responsible for their involvement.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order of 16 March 2022
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro), Merits, ICJ Reports 2007.
Armed Activities in the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2005.
Barcelona Traction Heat, Light, and Power Company (Belgium v Spain), Second Phase, ICJ Reports 1970.
Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v Uganda), Judgment, [2005] ICJ Rep. 168.
East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, [1995] ICJ Rep. 90.
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) [1996] ICJ Rep 226.
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v US) (Provisional Measures) [1984] ICJ Rep 169.
Prosecutor v Krstić (Appeals Judgment) IT-98-33-A (19 April 2004)
R. v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex P. Pinochet Ugarte (No.3), [2000] 1 A.C. 147 (HL), [1999] UKHL 17.
Reference Re Secession of Quebec, Canadian Supreme Court [1998] 2 SCR 217, 161 DLR (4th) 385, 115 ILR 536.
Treaties
Charter of the United Nations, 17 December 1963, 1 UNTS XVI (entered into force 24 September 1973) [UN Charter].
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 9 December 1948, 78 U.N.T.S 277 (entered into force 12 January 1951) [Genocide Convention].
Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1934) 165 L.N.T.S. 19 (Montevideo Convention).
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force 1 July 2002) [Rome Statute].
UN Documents
Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, UNGA Res 2625 (XXV) (24 October 1970)
Letter dated 24 February 2022 from the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (24 February 2022) UN Doc. S/2022/154.
UN Definition of Aggression, General Assembly, Resolution 3314 (XXIX), 14 December 1974, UN Doc. A/ 3314, Annex.
Amendments to Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court, adopted in 2010 and entering into force in 2017, UN Doc. C.N.651.2010.TREATIES-8.
ILC, ‘Fourth Report on Immunity of State Officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdiction’ (Concepción Escobar Hernández, Special Rapporteur), (2015) UN Doc. A/CN.4/686
ILC, ‘Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Text of the Draft Conclusions and Draft Annex Provisionally Adopted by the Drafting Committee on First Reading’ (2019) UN Doc. CN.4/727.
ILC, ‘Third Report on Jus Cogens’ (Special Rapporteur Dire Tladi) (2018) UN Doc. CN.4/714 , paras 94–102.
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries’ (November 2001) Supplement No. 10 UN Doc. A/56/10)
Books
Galeotti, Mark. Armies of Russia's War in Ukraine. vol. 228, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
Hernández Gleider, I. International Law. Oxford University Press, New York, 2022.
Jackson M. Complicity in International Law 1st edn. Oxford University Press 2015.
Shaw M, International Law 9th edn. Cambridge University Press 2021.
Articles
Cavandoli, Sofia, and Gary Wilson. "Distorting Fundamental Norms of International Law to Resurrect the Soviet Union: The International Law Context of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine." Netherlands International Law Review, 2022, pp. 1-28.
Pirie, Paul S. "National Identity and Politics in Southern and Eastern Ukraine." Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 48, no. 7, 1996, pp. 1079-1104.
Randall, Kenneth C. "Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law." Tex.L.Rev., vol. 66, 1987, pp. 785.
Van Schaack B, ‘Par in Parem Imperium Non Habet: Complementarity and the Crime of Aggression’ (2012) 10 133.
Websites
Amnesty International, “Ukraine: Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians” Amnesty International, 2022, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/08/ukraine-ukrainian-fighting-tactics-endanger-civilians. Accessed 1 November 2022.
Deutsch A and Toby Sterling, “ICC faces “myriad challenges” to prosecute war crimes in Ukraine” Reuters, 4 March 2022, www.nakedlaw.com/2009/05/index.html. Accessed 23 October 2022.
Gramer R, “Why Russia Just Withdrew from the ICC” Foreign Policy, 16 November 2016, https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/16/why-russia-just-withdrew-from-icc-putin-treaty-ukraine-law/. Accessed 30 October 2022.
NATO Watch, “Update 3 on the Ukraine-Russia-Nato Crisis” NATO Watch, 27 February 2022, https://natowatch.org/newsbriefs/2022/update-3-ukraine-russia-nato-crisis. Accessed 23 October 2022.
Reetz N, “Belarus is Complicit in Russia’s War of Aggression” EJIL:Talk!, 1 March 2022, https://www.ejiltalk.org/belarus-is-complicit-in-russias-war-of-aggression. Accessed 31 October 2022.
Scheffer D, “Aggression is Now a Crime” The New York Times, 1 July 2010, https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/opinion/02iht-edscheffer.html. Accessed 29 Ocober 2022.
Schwendiman D , “The Way: The Chief Prosecutor, the International Criminal Court, and Ukraine” Just Security, 20 March 2022, https://www.justsecurity.org/80757/the-way-the-chief-prosecutor-international-criminal-court-and-ukraine/. Accessed 30 October 2022.
Vasiliev S, “The Recknoning for War Crimes in Ukraine Has Begun” Foreign Policy, 17 June 2022, https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/06/17/war-crimes-trials-ukraine-russian-soldiers-shishimarin. Accessed 1 November 2022.