THE BEGINNING OF THE INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW APPLICATION TO CYBER ATTACK: THE STATUS OF RULE 30 TALLINN MANUAL 1.0

Main Article Content

Iradhati Zahra
Diajeng Wulan Christianti

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Technological development has given rise to new means and methods of warfare such as cyber-attack and can potentially have devastating humanitarian consequences. In times of armed conflict, International Humanitarian Law (IHL) limits certain use of weapons, however, it is questionable whether an armed conflict exists in the situation where cyber-attack is employed alone. In 2007, Estonia suffered severe damages due to cyber-attacks that were equal to the damages caused by kinetic weapons. Yet, there is a debate whether IHL applies in the Estonia case due to the shortage of a kinetic weapon. The Estonia case has generated NATO and other states to draft a cyber-warfare manual (Tallinn Manual 1.0) that, in its Rule 30, affirms the IHL applicability in the case of only cyber-attack. Due to the importance of this Rule, this article argues that Rule 30 shall be considered as a legally binding provision in the form of customary international law. This Rule has satisfied widely practiced and opinio juris elements although it is not as ideal as other customary norms. Taking into consideration the rapid development of technology, it is not necessary for Rule 30 to meet the ideal condition of customary law since, according to Grotian Moment Theory, the formation of a new customary international law can be accelerated in times of fundamental change as can be seen in the practice of customary air and space law.


Keywords: Customary International Law, Cyber-Attack, Grotian Moment Theory, IHL, Tallinn Manual 1.0


ABSTRAK
Perkembangan teknologi telah melahirkan cara dan metode berperang yang baru seperti serangan siber dan dapat berpotensi menimbulkan kehancuran umat manusia. Hukum Humaniter Internasional (HHI) membatasi penggunaan senjata tertentu saat perang, sayangnya penerapan hukum ini masih dipertanyakan dalam kasus yang hanya melibatkan serangan siber. Tahun 2007 Estonia menderita kerugian akibat dari serangan siber yang tingkat keparahannya dapat disamakan dengan serangan kinetis. Namun, fakta bahwa serangan tersebut tidak melibatkan senjata kinetis melahirkan perdebatan perihal penerapan HHI. Kasus Estonia telah mendorong NATO dan negara-negara lainya untuk merumuskan Manual tentang Perang Siber (Tallinn Manual 1.0) yang mengkonfirmasi penerapan HHI untuk kasus yang hanya melibatkan serangan siber. Pentingnya pengaturan dalam Pasal 30, artikel ini berpendapat bahwa pasal tersebut harus memiliki kekuatan hukum yang mengikat dalam bentuk aturan hukum kebiasaan internasional. Pasal 30 telah memenuhi unsur hukum kebiasaan internasional yakni praktek negara yang luas serta opinio juris. Sekalipun tidak dipenuhi secara sempurna seperti layaknya aturan hukum kebiasaan internasional yang lain. Dengan mempertimbangkan perkembangan teknologi yang pesat, Pasal 30 tidak perlu secara ideal memenuhi unsur norma hukum kebiasaan internasional, karena menurut Grotian Moment Theory pembentukan norma hukum kebiasaan internasional baru dapat dipercepat karena adanya perubahan yang fundamental. Hal ini dapat terlihat dari praktek hukum kebiasaan ruang angkasa.


Kata Kunci: Hukum Kebiasaan Internasional, Hukum Humaniter Internasional, Serangan Siber, Tallinn Manual 1.0, Teori Grotian Moment

Article Details

How to Cite
Zahra, I., & Wulan Christianti, D. (2021). THE BEGINNING OF THE INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW APPLICATION TO CYBER ATTACK: THE STATUS OF RULE 30 TALLINN MANUAL 1.0. Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 5(1), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.23920/pjil.v5i1.366
Section
Articles

References

Books
Green, James A. The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Henderson, Conway W. Understanding International Law, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010
Hoof, G.J.H. van. Pemikiran Kembali Sumber-Sumber Hukum Internasional, Bandung: Alumni, 2000.
Kalshoven, Frits dan Liesbeth Zegveld, Constraints on the Waging War, Geneva: ICRC, 3rd Edition, 2001.
Kolb, Robert dan Richard Hyde, An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2008.
Pellet, Allain, “Article 38”, Commentary: The Statute of the International Court of Justice, edited by Andreas Zimmermann (et.al), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Sassoli, Marco et.al., How Does Law Protect in War?, Volume I, 3rd Edition, Geneva: ICRC, , 2003.
Schimdt, Andreas, “The Estonian Cyber Attacks”, in The Fierce Domain Conflicts in Cyberspace 1986-2012, ed. Jason Healey (Washington D.C.: Atlantic Council, 2013).
Schmitt, Michael N. ed. Tallinn Manual 1.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law, New York: Cambridge University Press, 6th Edition, 2017.
Slouka, Zdenek J. International Custom and Continental Shelf, Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968.
Tikk, Eneken et.al. International Cyber Incidents Legal Considerations, Tallinn: CCD COE, 2010.
Zetter, Kim. Countdown to Zero Day Stuxnet and the Launch of the World’s First Digital Weapons, New York: Crown Publishers, 2014

Other Documents
Grignon, Julia, “The Beginning of Application of International Humanitarian Law: A Discussion of a Few Challenges”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 96. No. 893, 2014.
Hemment, Julie, “Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and Potemkin NGOs: Making Sense of Civil Society in Post-Soviet Russia”. Slavic Review, Volume 71, Issue 2, 2012
Herzog, Stephen, “Revisiting the Estonian Cyber Attacks: Digital Threats and Multinational Responses”, Journal of Straegic Security. Volume 4, Issue 2, 2011.
Hurley, W.J. (et.al), “Non-Kinetic Capabilities for Irregular Warfare: Four Case Studies”, Institute for Defense Analysis Paper, 2009.
ICRC, “How is the Term "Armed Conflict" Defined in International Humanitarian Law?”, Opinion Paper, March 2008
Jensen, Eric Talbot, “The Tallinn Manual 2.0: Highlights and Insights”, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Volume, Issue 1, 2017.
Kagan, Kimberly, “Iran’s Proxy War Against the U.S and the Iraqi Government”, Institute for the Study of War and weeklystandard.com, Mei 2006 – 20 Agustus 2007, http://www.understandingwar.org/report/irans-proxy-war-against-united-states-and-iraq
Khatwani, Naman, “Common Heritage of Mankind for Outer Space”, The International Journal for Space Politics & Policy, Vol. 17, No.2, 2019
Koh, Harold Hongju, “International Law in Cyber-Space”, USCYBERCOM Inter-Agency Legal Conference, disampaikan pada 18 September 2012, https://2009-2017.state.gov/s/l/releases/remarks/197924.htm
Ku, Julian, “Defining the Customary International Law of Outer Space”, http://opiniojuris.org/2006/10/18/defining-the-customary-international-law-of-outer-space/
Marco Sassoli, “How Does Law Protect in War?”, ICRC Online Casebook, https://casebook.icrc.org/glossary/internationalized-internal-armed-conflict.
Marttinen, Kaisa, “State Responsibility for Genocide – The International Court of Justice’s Judgment in the Genocide Case and its Aftermath”, Bachelor Thesis, Master of Laws programme in Lund University, 2016
Ottis, Rain, “Analysis of the 2007 Cyber Attacks Against Estonia from the Information Warfare Perspective”, Paper in Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Warfare, 2008
Oxford English Dictionary, https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/operation?q=operation
Parker, Diantha (et.al), “Iran, the United States and the Political Seesaw”, The New York Times, https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/04/07/world/middleeast/iran-timeline.html#/#time5_211
Scharf, Michael P., “Accelerated Formation of Customary International Law”, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 20, No.2, 2014
Schmitt, Michael N., “France’s Major Statement on International Law and Cyber: An Assessment”, Just Security, https://www.justsecurity.org/66194/frances-major-statement-on-international-law-and-cyber-an-assessment/
------------------------, “The Netherlands Releases a Tour de Force on International Law in Cyberspace: Analysis, Just Security, https://www.justsecurity.org/66562/the-netherlands-releases-a-tour-de-force-on-international-law-in-cyberspace-analysis/
Sevis, Kamile Nur dan Ensar Seker, “Cyber Warfare: Terms, Issues, and Controversies”, International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services Cyber Security, London, 13- 14 Juni 2016
Sterio, Milena, “Humanitarian Intervention Post-Syria: A Grotian Moment”, ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2014
UN GGE, “The Netherlands position on International Law in Cyberspace made public”, https://dig.watch/updates/netherlands-position-sinternational-law-cyberspace-made-public
Vlast, Kommersant- dan Elena Chernenko, “Russia Warns Against Nato Document Legitimizing Cyberwars”,
Wright, Jeremy, “Cyber and International Law in the 21st Century”, on May 23, 2018, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/cyber-and-international-law-in-the-21st-century
Yapici, Merve Irem, “What Role Did Nashı Play in Russıan Internal Polıtıcs And Foreıgn Polıcy? a Formulator or an Implementer?”, Review of International Law & Politıcs, Vol. 12, No.2, 2016
Zetter, Kim, “An Unprecedented Look at Stuxnet, the World’s First Digital Weapons”, https://www.wired.com/2014/11/countdown-to-zero-day-stuxnet/

Legal Documents
Commentary Konvensi Jenewa I 1949, 2016, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Comment.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=BE2D518CF5DE54EAC1257F7D0036B518#_Toc452041593
Commentary Protokol Tambahan I 1977, 1987, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Comment.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=7125D4CBD57A70DDC12563CD0042F793
Decision on the Defence Motion for
Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Prosecutor V. Dusko Tadic A/K/A "Dule", Case No. IT-94-1-T, 2nd October 1995
Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law with Commentaries, adopted by the International Law Commission and submitted to the General Assembly (A/73/10), 2018.
Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of 12 August 1949 (Geneva Convention I 1949)