Main Article Content

Abstract

The provisions related to children in conflict with the law are regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Child Criminal Justice System, which encompasses all forms of best interests, especially for children through the Restorative Justice approach. The problem in this study is how the regulation of the Criminal Justice System for children in conflict with the law in Indonesia and the urgency of customary law in realizing Restorative Justice in the settlement of cases of children in conflict with the law in Indonesia. The method used is Normative legal research with a statute approach and case approach. The results showed that the way to resolve children's criminal cases was through litigation and non-litigation. The urgency of customary law in realizing Restorative Justice in the settlement of cases of children dealing with the law in Indonesia needs to be reviewed because the settlement of children's cases through customary law will be very helpful and guarantee the best interests of the child. Meanwhile, the regulation on customary criminal sanctions in Law No. 11/2012 has not fully placed customary law as a Primum Remedium (primary remedy). Because in Article 71 paragraph (2) of Law No. 11/2012, customary sanctions are only a form of supplemental penalties. If the primary penalty is not enforced, the supplementary penalty cannot be implemented automatically.

Keywords

children local wisdom restorative justice

Article Details

How to Cite
Mantali, A. R. Y., Ismail, D. E., & Machmud, A. W. (2024). Child Development in The Context of Law Through Indigenous Approaches and Local Wisdom (Strengthening Restorative Justice Within the Criminal Justice System). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 9(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v9i1.1241

References

  1. Jurnal
  2. Analiansyah & Syarifah Rahmatillah, “Perlindungan Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum (Studi Terhadap Undang-Undang Peradilan Anak Indonesia dan Peradilan Adat Aceh)”, Gender Equality : Internasional Journal of Child and Gender Studies, Volume 1, Nomor 1, Maret, 2015.
  3. Bambang Sarutomo, “Penyebab Anak di Bawah Umur Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Kabupaten Demak”, International Journal of Law Society Services, Volume 1, Nomor 1, Tahun 2021.
  4. Dewi Setyowati, “Memahami Konsep Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menggapai Keadilan”, Pandecta, Volume 15, Nomor 1, Tahun 2020.
  5. Septa Chandra, “Politik Hukum Pengadopsian Restorative Justice dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana”, Fiat Justicia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 8, Nomor 2, Tahun 2014
  6. Septa Candra, Restorative Justice : Suatu Tinjauan Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 2 Nomor 2, Agustus 2013.
  7. Ulang Mangun Sosiawan, “Perspektif Restorative Justice Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Volume 16, Nomor 4, Tahun 2016
  8. Wahyu Jontah & Wencislaus Sirjon Nansi, “Penguatan Restoratif Justice Melalui Pendekatan Adat dan Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 7, Nomor 2, Agustus 2018.
  9. Yusi Amdani, “Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian oleh Anak Berbasis Hukum Islam dan Adat Aceh”, Jurnal Al-‘Adalah, Volume 13, Nomor 1, Tahun 2016.
  10. Yutirsa Yunus, “Analisis Konsep Restorative Justice Melalui Sistem Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia”, Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Volume 2 Nomor 2, Agustus 2013
  11. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  12. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
  13. Sumber Lain
  14. Mahir Sikki Z.A (Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Palopo Kelas I B), Sekilas tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, https://www.pn-palopo.go.id/berita/artikel , diakses pada tanggal 2 Agustus 2022 pukul 13.17 WITA