Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 969 Download : 174

Main Article Content

Abstract

Provisions regarding the prohibition of pornography in Indonesia are specifically regulated in the Law on Pornography 2008. It provides a very broad scope to ensnare people involved in pornographic videos. It actually tends to place victims of revenge porn as perpetrators in the crime of pornography. In this study, there are three problems examined, namely the pornography debate; between art, private life and lawlessness, the formulation of the prohibition of pornography in Indonesian law and its weaknesses, and the study of gender bias in cases of pornography involving women. This research is a normative juridical study examining the weakness of the legal substance of the prohibition of pornography. The debate about pornography gives birth to several perspectives in which the body is seen as an art and human right. However, presenting body shape is seen as a violation of values and the law. The spread of pornography in cyberspace is regulated in the Criminal Code, the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions and the Law on Pornography. Society has a double standard of sexual activity performed by men and women. As a result, the society shows hatred towards women engaging in pornography.

Keywords

gender bias legal misleading pornography women

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Aryana, I. W. P. S., & Citra, M. E. A. (2024). The Pornography Formulation in Legislation; Between Gender Bias and Legal Misleading Tendencies. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 9(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v9i1.1277
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Book
  2. Agus Raharjo, Cyber Crime Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2012.
  3. Badar Nawawi Arief, Tindak Pidana Mayantara Perkembangan Kajian Cyber Crime di Indonesia, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta: 2006.
  4. Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2016.
  5. Budi Suhariyanto, Tindak Pidana Teknolohi Informasi (Cyebercrime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya, PT Grafindo Persada, Jakarta: 2017.
  6. Leden Marpaung, Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan Dan Masalah Prevensinya, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2018.
  7. Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Bina Aksara, Jakarta: 2018.
  8. Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta: 2018.
  9. Journal
  10. Andrine Prima Afneta, "Komodifikasi Kebertubuhan Perempuan dalam Wacana Erotika dan Pornografi pada Tayangan Televisi," Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2018.
  11. Bernadette H. Schell et al., "Cyber Child Pornography: A Review Paper of The Social and Legal Issues and Remedies—and A Proposed Technological Solution," Aggression and Violent Behavior, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2007.
  12. Clare McGlynn and Hannah Bows, "Possessing Extreme Pornography: Policing, Prosecutions and The Need for Reform," The Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 83, No. 6, 2019.
  13. Clare McGlynn, Erika Rackley, and Ruth Houghton, "Beyond ‘Revenge Porn’: The Continuum of Image-based Sexual Abuse," Feminist Legal Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2017.
  14. Daniel Susilo and Eben Haezer, "Konstruksi Seksualitas Perempuan dalam Berita Pemerkosaan di Teks Media Daring," Jurnal Kawistara, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2017.
  15. Danielle K. Citron, and Mary Anne Franks, "Criminalizing Revenge Porn," Wake Forest L. Rev., Vol. 49, 2014.
  16. Dewi Bunga, "Legal Response to Cybercrime in Global and National Dimensions," Padjadjaran Journal of Law, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2019.
  17. Dodo Zaenal Abidin, "Kejahatan dalam Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi," Jurnal Processor, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2017.
  18. Faizal Amrul Muttaqin and Wahyu Saputra, "Budaya Hukum Malu Sebagai Nilai Vital Terwujudnya Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat," Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, Vol. 1, No.2, 2019.
  19. Hotnarida Witasari, “Kerjasama Guru Bimbingan dan Konseling dengan Orangtua dalam Pengentasan Masalah Siswa Menonton Video Porno,” Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2013.
  20. Hwian Christianto, "Konsep Hak Seseorang atas Tubuh dalam Transplantasi Organ Berdasarkan Nilai Kemanusiaan," Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2011.
  21. Joseph N. Goh, Ghislaine L. Lewis, and Pauline PY Leong, "Sexy Media Dissidents: State Regulation, Dissidence, Pornography and Gay Men in Malaysia," Sexuality & Culture, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2019.
  22. Mary Anne Franks, "Revenge Porn Reform: A View from the Front Lines," Fla. L. Rev., Vol. 69, 2017.
  23. Maudy Fitri Hutami and Nuryah Asri Sjafirah, "Framing Media Online Tribunnews. Com Terhadap Sosok Perempuan Dalam Berita Video Pornografi Depok," Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2018.
  24. Michael Salter and Thomas Crofts. "Responding to Revenge Porn: Challenges to Online Legal Impunity," New Views on Pornography: Sexuality, Politics, and The Law, 2015.
  25. Ni Luh Gede Yogi Arthani, "Eksploitasi Anak dalam Penyebaran Pornografi di Dunia Maya," Jurnal Advokasi, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2018.
  26. Prima Angkupi, "Cultural Approaches in Cyberporn Crime Prevention," Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2017.
  27. Roy F. Baumeister dan Jean M. Twenge, “Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality,” Review of General Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002.
  28. Samantha Bates, "Revenge Porn and Mental Health: A Qualitative Analysis of The Mental Health Effects of Revenge Porn on Female Survivors," Feminist Criminology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2017.
  29. Wahyu Agus Dwi Atmoko, “Cyber Pornografi dan Gangguan Perilaku Mental,” FROM CITIZEN TO NETIZEN, 2015.
  30. Yaniv Efrati and Yair Amichai-Hamburger, “Are Adolescents Who Consume Pornography Different from Those Who Engaged in Online Sexual Activities?” Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 111, No. 104843, 2020.
  31. Legislations
  32. The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 44 of 2008 concerning Pornography
  33. The Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Technology Number 19 of 2014 concerning Handling Internet Sites with Negative Contents
  34. The Law on Information and Electronic Transactions 2008
  35. The Criminal Code
  36. General Assembly resolution A/RES/54/263 of 25 May 2000
  37. Other Resources
  38. Abdul Rahman, “ICJR: Video Syur Untuk Kepentingan Pribadi Tidak Bisa Dipidana,” JawaPost.com, November 11, 2020, https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/hukum-kriminal/11/11/2020/icjr-video-syur-untuk-kepentingan-pribadi-tidak-bisa-dipidana/
  39. Baharudin Al Farisi, “Kronologi Tersebarnya Video Syur Gisel dan MYD,” Kompas.com, December 30, 2020, https://www.kompas.com/hype/read/2020/12/30/174300666/kronologi-tersebarnya-video-syur-gisel-dan-myd?page=all.