Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 518 Download : 439

Main Article Content

Abstract

DTLST (Integrated Circuits Layout Design) is an open-potential electro-semiconductor technology product developed to build creative industries by effectively protecting IPR as registration. Registration is presently not effectively used, with DTLST violations observed. This study examines the protective patterns of DTLST IPR in building creative industries in the 5.0 digitization industries in Indonesia. A normative juridical method was analytically used, with data collection techniques the literature study primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that Law no. 32 of 2000 concerning DTLST provided advantages for designers because registration was conducted without a market potential test and affected the legal certainty guarantee of the registrant. However, the arrangement did not accommodate substantive examination, priority rights, and protection of the privilege of owners in good faith. This indicated the necessity for improvement by considering the philosophical factors of justice, balance, and democratic-juridical values regarding the binding power of the regulatory and sociological substance via the living law of the designer. Based on the results, collaboration was needed with the DTLST Office, government, private sector, and universities concerning the use and management of DTLST to build creative industries in the Industries 5.0 era in Indonesia.

Keywords

creative industries digitization 5.0 integrated circuits layout design;

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nurani, N. (2024). Layout Design for Building Creative Industries in Digitalization Industries 5.0 in Indonesia . Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 8(2), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v8i2.1435
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abduh, R., & Fajaruddin, F. (2021). Intellectual Property Rights Protection Function In Resolving Copyright Disputes. International Journal Reglement & Society (Ijrs), 2(3), 170–178.
  2. Akbar, J. (2021, October 6). Ada Ratusan Kasus Kekayaan Intelektual Per Tahun, Terbanyak Soal Merek. Viva.Co.Id. https://www.viva.co.id/berita/bisnis/1411382-ada-ratusan-kasus-kekayaan-intelektual-per-tahun-terbanyak-soal-merek
  3. Alshawawreh, N. K. (2021). The scope of legal protection for designs of integrated circuits in Bahraini and comparative legislation. Journal Of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 16(9), 1006–1012.
  4. Barthos, M., & Sara, R. (2019). Dysfunctional IP infringements and ineffectiveness of enforcement mechanisms under Indonesian law. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(1), 1–10.
  5. Bintang, S. (2018). Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu sebagai Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Hukum Indonesia. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(1), 23–38.
  6. Cho, D., & Moon, H. (2013). From Adam Smith to Michael Porter: Evolution of competitiveness theory (extended edition) (Vol. 7). World Scientific.
  7. Mayana, R. F. (2004). Perlindungan Desain Industri di Indonesia dalam Era Perdagangan Bebas. Grasindo.
  8. Moore, A. D. (2012). A Lockean theory of intellectual property revisited. San Diego L. Rev., 49, 1069.
  9. Nikitenko, S. M., Mesyats, M. A., & Rozhkova, O. V. (2017). Intellectual property as an instrument of interaction between government, business, science and society. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 84(1), 012015.
  10. Nugrahani, R. A. G. (2006). Kelemahan Hukum dalam Undang-undang No. 32 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 1(1), 37–46.
  11. Nurani, N. (2012). IPR protection over the merchandise works of creative industry to improve Indonesia economic development. International Journal of Research in Management, 2, 4–5.
  12. Nurani, N. (2013). The implementation of TRIPs-WTO in the protection of IPR over fashion trademark of creative industry as an effort to improve global competitiveness.
  13. Nurani, N. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Protection of Creative and Innovative Creative Industry Works through the Role of West Java Government in Improving the Growth of Creative Economics in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.Ijicc.Net, 6(6). www.ijicc.net
  14. Pearson, H. E., & Miller, C. G. (1990). Commercial exploitation of intellectual property. Blackstone Press.
  15. Quoc, N. P. (2020). Impacts of IPRS Basic Provisions in CPTPP on Technology Transfer and Innovation-Suggestion in Indonesia. Indonesian J. Int’l L., 18, 457.
  16. Rahmah, M. (2017). The protection of agricultural products under geographical indication: An alternative tool for agricultural development Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 22(2), 90–103.
  17. Reily, M. (2019, April 8). Bekraf Usul Sertifikat Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Jadi Agunan Pembiayaan - Katadata.co.id. Katadata.Co.Id. https://katadata.co.id/desysetyowati/berita/5e9a51a81725a/bekraf-usul-sertifikat-hak-kekayaan-intelektual-jadi-agunan-pembiayaan
  18. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency.
  19. Sefat, N., Abir, M., & Ahamed, Md. A. (2021). Intellectual Property Laws provide exclusive rights to creators or inventors: Bangladesh Perspective.
  20. Seidman, A. W., Seidman, R. B., & Abeyesekere, N. (2012). Assessing Legislation: A Manual for Legislators. National Institute for Legislative Studies.
  21. Sherwood, R. M. (2019). Intellectual property and economic development. Routledge.
  22. Siantoro, A. (2020, February 15). Revolusi Industri 4.0 : Peluang Munculnya Profesi-Profesi Baru - Analisis Data Katadata. Katadata.Co.Id. https://katadata.co.id/ayu/analisisdata/5e9a57afc770e/revolusi-industri-40-peluang-munculnya-profesi-profesi-baru
  23. Sreeragi. (2021). Intellectual property rights (IPR): An overview. Emperor International Journal of Library and Information Technology Research.
  24. Sudjana, S. (2017). DESAIN TATA LETAK SIRKUIT TERPADU DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INTEREN. Veritas et Justitia, 3(1), 218–243.
  25. Sudjana, S. (2019). Penerapan Sistem Hukum Menurut Lawrence W Friedman Terhadap Efektivitas Perlindungan Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2000. Al Amwal (Hukum Ekonomi Syariah), 2(2), 78–94.
  26. Sudjana, S. (2020). PENDAFTARAN DESAIN TATA LETAK SIRKUIT TERPADU TERHADAP PENGEMBANGAN INDUSTRI TEKNOLOGI ELEKTRONIKA INDONESIA. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 19(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.5614/SOSTEK.ITBJ