Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 522 Download : 259

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Aarhus Convention has played a pivotal role in advancing public participation in environmental matters in the world. This article introduces the principles and pillars of the Aarhus Convention as well as explores the Convention's impact on environmental governance and the promotion of transparent and inclusive decision-making processes. By examining the legal and institutional frameworks, case studies, and challenges faced in the implementation of the Aarhus Convention principles, it sheds light on Indonesia's journey towards achieving environmental sustainability through enhanced public involvement. The analysis reveals that, while significant progress has been made, there still need to be obstacles to fully realizing the Convention's objectives in Indonesia. This article underscores the need for continued efforts to strengthen the legal infrastructure, capacity building, and public awareness to ensure robust public participation and environmental protection in the Indonesian context.

Keywords

environment justice participation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mulyana, I., & Kurniati, N. (2024). Public Participation in Environmental Matters: Indonesia’s Brief Reflection. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 9(1), 61-95. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v9i1.1508
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Books
  2. Alexandre Kiss and Dinah Shelton, Guide to International Environmental Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, Netherlands: 2007.
  3. Anaïs Berthier and Ludwig Krämer, The Aarhus Convention: Implementation and compliance in EU law, The European Union Aarhus Centre, 2014.
  4. Benjamin J. Richardson and Stepan Wood (eds), Environmental Law for Sustainability, Oxford: Hart 2006.
  5. Christopher Stone, Should Tress Have Standing? Law, Morality and the Environment, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, London: 2010.
  6. David Hunter, James Salzman, and Durwood Zaelke, International Environmental Law and Policy 4th ed., Foundation Press, 2007.
  7. David Nicholson, Environmental Dispute Resolution in Indonesia, BRILL, Netherlands: 2010.
  8. Dinah Shelton and Donald K. Anton, Environmental Protection and Human Rights, CUP, 2011.
  9. Frans Coenen (eds), Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions, Springer, UK: 2008.
  10. Garret Hardin, Exploring New Ethics for Survival: The Voyage of the Spaceship Beagle, Viking Press, 1972.
  11. Gyula Bándi, Environmental Democracy and Law: Public Participation in Europe, Europa Law Publishing, 2014.
  12. Harding (ed.), Access to Environmental Justice: A Comparative Study, BRILL, Netherlands: 2007.
  13. Koesnadi Hardjasoemantri, Hukum Tata Lingkungan 7th edition, Gajah Mada University Press, Indonesia, 2002.
  14. Linda Hajjar Leib, Human Rights and the Environment: Philosophical, Theoretical and Legal Perspectives, BRILL, Netherlands: 2010.
  15. Michael Mason, Environmental Democracy: A Contextual Approach, Earthscan, 1999.
  16. Philippe Sands, Principles of Environmental Law, 2nd Edition, CUP 2003.
  17. Siti Sundari Rangkuti, Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijaksanaan Lingkungan Nasional, Airlangga University Press, Indonesia, 2000.
  18. Stephen Stec (ed), Handbook on Access to Justice under the Aarhus Convention, ProTertia, 2003.
  19. William Ophuls, Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity, Freeman, 1977.
  20. Journals
  21. Abdul Haseeb Ansari, “Principle 10, the Aarhus Convention and Status of Public Participation in Environmental Matters in the Malaysian Laws with Special Reference to EIAs”, IIUMLJ, Vol. 17, 2009
  22. Achim Halpaap, “Understanding the Democracy-Environment Interface”, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND LAW, Vol. 8, 2008.
  23. Alan Boyle, “Human Rights and the Environment: Where Next?”, Eur J Int Law, Vol. 23, 2012.
  24. Andriy Andrusevych, “The Right to Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making in Ukraine: Challenges of Compliance” Hum. Rts. & Int'l Legal Discourse, Vol. 2, 2018.
  25. Azizan Marzuki, “Challenges in the Public Participation and the Decision Making”, Sociologija i prostor, Vol. 53, 2015.
  26. Benjamin W. Cramer, “the Human Right to Information, the Environment and Information about the Environment: From the Universal Declaration to the Aarhus Convention” COMM.L. & POL’Y, Vol. 29, 2014.
  27. Birgit Peters, “Unpacking the Diversity of Procedural Environmental Rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and the Aarhus Convention” Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 30, 2018.
  28. Cesare Pitea, ‘‘The Non-Compliance Procedure of the Aarhus Convention: Between Environmental and Human Rights Control Mechanisms”, Italian Y.B. Int'l L, Vol. 16, 2016.
  29. Dadang Purnama, “Reform of the EIA Process in Indonesia: Improving the Role of Public Involvement”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol 3, 2003.
  30. Dallen J. Timothy, “Participatory planning: a view of tourism in Indonesia”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 26, 1999.
  31. Dinah Shelton, “Developing Substantive Environmental Rights” J of Human Rights and the Env, Vol. 1, 2010.
  32. Djoko Suhardjanto and Umi Choiriyah, “Information Gap: Demand Supply Environmental Disclosure di Indonesia” Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, Vol. 3, 2013.
  33. Elvie Wahyuni, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup di Luar Pengadilan” Al Ahkam, Vol. 4, 2009.
  34. Hans Wiklund, “In search of arenas for democratic deliberation: a Habermasian review of environmental assessment” J Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 23, 2005.
  35. Holly Doremus, “Environmental Ethics and Environmental Law: Harmony, Dissonance, Cacophony, or Irrelevance?”, U.C. Davis Law Review, Vol. 37, 2003.
  36. Ilyas Asaad, “UUPLH No. 32 tahun 2009: Tonggak Baru Keberlanjutan LH” Jurnal Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, Vol 9, 2010.
  37. Jeremy Wates, “the Aarhus Convention: A Driving Force for Environmental Democracy”, J. Eur. Envtl. & Plan. L., Vol. 2, 2005.
  38. Jeroen van Bekhoven, “Public Participation as a General Principle in International Environmental Law: Its Current Status and Real Impact”, NTU Law Review, Vol. 11, 2016.
  39. Jerzy Jendroska, “Aarhus Convention and Community Law: The Interplay” J. Eur. Envtl. & Plan, Vol. 2, 2005.
  40. Jonas Ebbesson, “Public Participation and Privatization in Environmental Matters: An Assessment of the Aarhus Convention” Erasmus L. Rev., Vol. 4, 2011.
  41. Jonas Ebbesson, “The Notion of Public Participation in International Environmental Law”, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 8, 1997.
  42. JR Robinson, et al., “Public Access to Environmental Information: A Means to What End?”, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 8, 1996.
  43. Leslie-Anne and Duvic-Paoli, “the Status of the Right to Public Participation in International Environmental Law: An Analysis of the Jurisprudence”, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 23, 2012.
  44. Margrethe Winslow, “Is Democracy Good for the Environment?” JEPM, Vol. 48, 2005.
  45. Maria Lee and Carolyn Abbot, “The Usual Suspect? Public Participation under the Aarhus Convention” Mod. L. Rev., Vol. 66, 2003.
  46. Marianne Dellinger, “Ten Years of the Aarhus Convention: How Procedural Democracy Is Paving the Way for Substantive Change in National and International Environmental Law” Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y, Vol. 23, 2012.
  47. Mas Achmad Santosa and Margaretha Quina, “Gerakan Pembaruan Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Dan Perwujudan Tata Kelola Lingkungan Yang Baik Dalam Negara Demokrasi”, Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, Vol. 1, 2014.
  48. Michael Mason, “Information Disclosure and Environmental Rights: The Aarhus Convention”, Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 10, 2010.
  49. Quan Li and Rafael Reuveny, “Democracy and Environmental Degradation” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 50, 2006.
  50. Richard Desgane, “Integrating Environmental Values into European Convention on Human Rights”, Am, J. Int’l L, Vol. 89, 1995.
  51. Seiyed A. Sajjadi and M Hossein Ramazani Ghavamabadi, “The Element of Access to Information in Aarhus Convention and Act Regarding Dissemination and Free Access to Information”, Journal of Politics and Law, Vol. 0, 2016.
  52. Sherry R. Arnstein, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, JAPA, Vol. 35, 1969.
  53. Volker Mauerhofer, “Public participation in environmental matters: Compendium, challenges and chances globally”, Land Use Policy, Vol. 52, 2016.
  54. Legislations
  55. Council Directive 2003/4/EC on Public Access to Environmental Information and Repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC, 2003 O.J. L 41/26.
  56. Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment, 1985 O.J. L 175/40. That Directive has now been replaced by Directive 2011/92 of the European Parliament and the Council (2012 O.J. L 26/1).
  57. Council Directive 90/313/EEC on Freedom of Access to Information on the Environment, 1990 O. J. L 158/56.
  58. Council Directive 96/61/EC on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, 1996 O. J. L 257.
  59. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment 1972
  60. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
  61. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
  62. The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992
  63. The Aarhus Convention 1998
  64. Other Resources
  65. Aniek Hindrayani and Purwanto, ‘Public Participation Planning of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Regulations: Analysis of Inconsistency for Some Cases in Indonesia’ Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2017).
  66. Dyah Paramita, Dessy Eko Prayitno, and Margaretha Quina, Strengthening the Right to Information for People and Environment, (ICEL Final Report, 2013).
  67. Elena Petkova, et. al. Closing The Gap: Information, Participation, And Justice In Decision-Making For The Environment (World Resources Institute 2002)
  68. Warren, C. and Elston, K., Environmental Regulations in Indonesia, Asia Paper no. 3 (Nedlands, University of Western Australia, 1994)
  69. Websites
  70. Agusmanto ‘Proyek Geothermal di Solok, Kadis ESDM Sumbar: Masyarakat akan Sejahtera’ (Klikpositif, 3 December 2018) http://news.klikpositif.com/baca/42569/proyek-geothermal-di-solok--kadis-esdm-sumbar--masyarakat-akan-sejahtera?page=2
  71. BPK RI, ‘BPK Beberkan Empat Tahap Penyimpangan’ (BPK RI, 4 Juni 2014) < http://www.bpk.go.id/news/bpk-beberkan-empat-tahap-penyimpangan>
  72. Forbali, ‘Tolak Reklamasi Berkedok Revitalisasi Teluk Benoa Segera Batalkan Perpres 51 Tahun 2014 (forbali.org, 8 April 2015) < http://www.forbali.org/id/pernyataan-sikap-tolak-reklamasi-berkedok-revitalisasi-teluk-benoa/>
  73. Jason Unger, Environmental rights in Alberta. Module 1: substantive environmental (The Environmental Law Centre 2016)
  74. M Ambari, ‘Tanpa Perda Zonasi, Ahok Ternyata Sudah Terbitkan Pergub Reklamasi’ (Mongabay Situs Berita Lingkungan, 17 January 2017) < https://www.mongabay.co.id/2017/01/17/tanpa-perda-zonasi-ahok-ternyata-sudah-terbitkan-pergub-reklamasi/>
  75. Tempo, ‘Tolak PLTU, Warga Satu Kelurahan di Bengkulu Minta Direlokasi’ (Tempo, 2 September 2016)
  76. UNITAR, ‘Institutions, Public Participation and Environmental Sustainability: Bridging research and capacity development’ (2008 UNITAR-Yale Conference on Environmental Governance and Democracy)
  77. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Introducing the Aarhus Convention, available at
  78. Vinolia ‘Ketika Warga di Solok Protes Pembangunan Pembangkit Panas Bumi, Mengapa?’ (Mongabay Situs Berita Lingkungan, 20 September 2017) < https://www.mongabay.co.id/2017/09/30/ketika-warga-di-solok-protes-pembagunan-pembangkit-panas-bumi-mengapa/>