Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to explore the tension between non-negotiable privacy policies of giant tech companies and Indonesian competition law. It scrutinizes the prevalent practice of imposing standard agreements on users, which often leads to an erosion of privacy and market competition. This article employs a normative legal research methodology complemented by Reform-Oriented Research. This method is used to evaluate the practice of non-negotiable privacy policies against the suitability of existing competition law regulations and to recommend changes to the regulations as deemed necessary. The study queries whether such non-negotiable privacy policies constitute an exploitative abuse of dominance under Article 25 of Law 5/1999. The analysis delves into the relationship between personal data exploitation and competition law, suggesting that the accumulation and control of user data by giant techs may strengthen their market dominance, potentially resulting in anticompetitive practices. The research offers insights into the intersection of data protection and competition law, advocating for an integrated approach to address the challenges of the digital economy. It recommends policy changes, including the adoption of Codes of Conduct, data mobility, and open standards to foster competition. Furthermore, the manuscript suggests leveraging the Small But Significant And Non-Transitory Decrease In Quality (SSNDQ) method for market analysis in the digital domain. In conclusion, this research calls for Indonesian competition law to adapt and proactively respond to the use of non-negotiable privacy policies and the complex dynamics of data-centric digital market business models, ensuring that markets remain competitive and consumer rights are protected.

Keywords

abuse of dominant competition law digital market privacy data privacy policy

Article Details

How to Cite
Taufiqurrohman, M. M., Lita, H. N., & Pah, G. G. A. (2024). Tech Giants’ Non-Negotiable Privacy Policies Strategy versus Indonesian Competition Law. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 9(1), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v9i1.1679

References

  1. Alleman, James, et al, “Multisided Markets and Platform Dominance,” in Applied Economics in the Digital Era, ed. James Alleman, Paul N. Rappoport, and Mohsen Hamoudia, New York City: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
  2. Efendi, Aan, et al, Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal, Yogyakarta: LaksBang Justitia, 2019.
  3. Ezrachi, Ariel, Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016.
  4. Graef, Inge, EU Competition Law, Data Protection and Online Platforms: Data as Essential Facility: Data as Essential Facility, Zuid-Holland: Kluwer Law International BV, 2021.
  5. Rosadi, Sinta Dewi, Pembahasan UU Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU RI No. 27 Tahun 2022), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023.
  6. Thomas Cyriac, Noby, Big Data and the Abuse of Dominance by Multi-Sided Platforms: An Analysis of Art. 102 TFEU, Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2022.
  7. Aridi, Anwar, and Petrovcic, Urska, Big Tech, Small Tech, and the Data Economy, Washington: World Bank, 2019.
  8. David J. Teece et al., “Managing Multi-Sided Platforms: Platform Origins and Go-to-Market Strategy,” California Management Review Vol. 64 No. 4, 2022.
  9. De Mauro, Andrea, et al, “A Formal Definition of Big data based on its Essential Features”, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Library review Vol. 65, No. 3, 2016.
  10. Disyon, Huta, and Gultom, Elisatris, “Critical Review of the Implementation of the Making of SOE as a Holding from Anti-Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition Perspective,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 22, No. 2, 2022.
  11. Doherty, Barry, “Just what are essential facilities?”, Common Market Law Review Vol. 38, No. 2, 2001.
  12. Parluhutan, Dian, “Analisis Hukum Kompetisi terhadap "Big Data" dan Doktrin "Essential Facility" dalam Transaksi Merger di Indonesia”, Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Vol. 1, No. 1, 2021.
  13. Frischmann, Brett and Waller, Spencer Weber, “Revitalizing essential facilities”, HeinOnline AntitrUSt lJ Vol. 75, No. 1, 2008.
  14. Graef, Inge, “Rethinking the essential facilities doctrine for the EU digital economy”, HeinOnline RJT ns, Vol. 53, No. 1 2019.
  15. Holková Lubyová, Linda, “Big data in the EU Competition Law,” SSRN, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2018.
  16. Hutchinson, Christophe Samuel, et al, “Tacit collusion on steroids: The potential risks for competition resulting from the use of algorithm technology by companies”, MDPI Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2021.
  17. J. Teece, David, et al., “Managing Multi-Sided Platforms: Platform Origins and Go-to-Market Strategy,” California Management Review Vol. 64, No. 4, 2022.
  18. Kurdoglu, Berkay, and Deniz Ata, Caglar, “Data Economics and Competition Law,” Digital L. Rev. Vol. 3 No. 1, 2021.
  19. Kurniawan, Faizal Kurniawan, Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa, and Nugraha, Xavier, “Legal Protection Of Trade Secrets Over The Potential Disposal Of Trade Secrets Under The Re-Engineering Precautions,” Jurnal Kebijakan Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 16, No. 2, 2021.
  20. Lao, Marina, “Search, Essential Facilities, and the Antitrust Duty to Deal”, HeinOnline Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. Vol. 11, No. 3, 2012.
  21. Lee, Cassey, “Competition Policy in the Age of Algorithms: Challenges for Indonesia,” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies Vol. 58, No. 3, 2022.
  22. Manuel Sanchez‐Cartas, Juan and León, Gonzalo, “Multisided Platforms And Markets: A Survey Of The Theoretical Literature,” Journal of Economic Surveys Vol. 35, No. 2, 2021.
  23. Mays, Lisa, “The Consequences of Search Bias: How Application of the Essential Facilities Doctrine Remedies Google’s Unrestricted Monopoly on Search in the United States and Europe”, HeinOnline Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Vol. 83, No. 3, 2014.
  24. Ningsih, Ayup Suran, “Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Pada Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah (UMKM),” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 19, No. 2, 2019.
  25. Pardede, Marulak, “Investment Regulatorly Reform in Indonesia (an Effort to Increase the Competitiveness Climate of Investment),” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 23, No. 2, 2023.
  26. Pfeiffer, Roberto Augusto Castellanos, “Digital economy, big data and competition law”, HeinOnline Mkt. & Competition L. Rev., Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019.
  27. Rahman, Faiz and Wicaksono, Dian Agung “Researching References on Interpretation of Personal Data in the Indonesian Constitution,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 21, No. 2, 2021.
  28. Robertson, Viktoria HSE, “Excessive data collection: privacy considerations and abuse of dominance in the era of big data”, Common Market Law Review Vol. 57, No. 1, 2020.
  29. Safiranata, Tasya et al., “The Role of E-Commerce in Escalation of Digital Economy in The New Normal Era Based on Law Number 27 of 2022 Concerning Personal Data Protection,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 22, No. 4, 2022.
  30. Santoso, Edy, and Andriana, “Insecurity to Consumer Data Protection in The eHealth Sector,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 23, No. 1, 2023.
  31. Simanjuntak, Marsinta, “Disgorgement Fund to Create Corrective Justice as a Legal Protection Measure for Investors in The Capital Market (Legal Protection of Investors Against Disgorgement Fund to Realize Corrective Justice),” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 23, No. 4, 2023.
  32. Situmorang, Mosgan, “Measuring The Effectiveess of Consumer Dispute Resolution on Small Value E-Commerce Transaction,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 22, No. 4, 2022.
  33. Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa and Gultom, Elisatris, “Corporate Digital Responsibility: Tanggung Jawab Etis Penggunaan Teknologi Digital dalam Bisnis Perusahaan” Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Vol. 13, No. 2, 2023.
  34. Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa, “Adopting Osman Warning In Indonesia: An Effort To Protect Potential Victims Of Crime Target,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan Vol.11, No. 3, 2022.
  35. Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa, et al, “Mengatur Petisi Di Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Upaya Penguatan Posisi Masyarakat Terhadap Negara Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Kebebasan Berpendapat,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol. 18, No. 1, 2021.
  36. Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa, et al, “Meninjau Perang Siber: Dapatkah Konvensi-Konvensi Hukum Humaniter Internasional Meninjau Fenomena Ini?,” Jurnal Kawruh Abiyasa, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2021.
  37. Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa, et al., “The Use of Necessitas Non Habet Legem and Wederspanningheid in Law Enforcement for Covid-19 Vaccination in Indonesia,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol. 21, No. 4, 2021.
  38. Tucker, Catherine, “Digital Data, Platforms and the Usual [Antitrust] Suspects: Network Effects, Switching Costs, Essential Facility”, Review of Industrial Organization Vol. 54, No. 4, 2019.
  39. Law Number 5 of 1999 regarding Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
  40. Indonesia Competition Commission Regulation No. 01 of 2014 concerning the Organization and Working Procedures of the Indonesia Competition Commission and Presidential Decree No. 75 of 1999 concerning the Business Competition Supervisory Commission
  41. Antitrust: Commission fines Google €2.42 billion, European Commission - European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1784, accessed April 24 2023.
  42. Grahanusa Mediatama, “Benarkah kebijakan privasi baru WhatsApp serahkan data ke Facebook? ini penjelasannya,” PT. Kontan Grahanusa Mediatama, April 10, 2021, https://lifestyle.kontan.co.id/news/benarkah-kebijakan-privasi-baru-whatsapp-serahkan-data-ke-facebook-ini-penjelasannya-1.
  43. Mohammad Bernie, “Ketika Kebijakan Privasi Terbaru Tokopedia Ancam Data Pengguna,” tirto.id, accessed April 11, 2023, https://tirto.id/ketika-kebijakan-privasi-terbaru-tokopedia-ancam-data-pengguna-gae9.
  44. Mohammad Bernie, “Tokopedia Ubah Kebijakan Privasi, Apa Dampaknya ke Data Pribadi?,” tirto.id, accessed April 11, 2023, https://tirto.id/tokopedia-ubah-kebijakan-privasi-apa-dampaknya-ke-data-pribadi-gadU.