Articles

Determining Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts: Challenges and Solutions

    Authors

  • Sugeng Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Selam Bastomi Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Moestopo, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Widya Romasindah Aidy Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
PDF
Published 07-09-2026
Pages 19-41
Section Articles

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Determining the applicable law in international trade contracts remains a critical challenge because cross-border transactions involve diverse legal systems. Differences between civil law and common law traditions, public policy exceptions, and difficulties in enforcing foreign judgments or arbitral awards create uncertainty for contracting parties. This study aims to examine practical and theoretical frameworks for determining applicable law and to identify mechanisms that strengthen predictability, fairness, and enforceability in international commerce. Its novelty lies in contextualizing choice-of-law mechanisms within digital globalization, where rapidly evolving commercial practices, electronic transactions, and borderless business relationships increasingly test conventional conflict-of-laws principles. Using a doctrinal legal research method, the study analyzes international legal instruments, relevant legal doctrines, scholarly interpretations, comparative principles, selected cases, and sector-specific contractual practices. The results demonstrate that formulated choice-of-law clauses significantly reduce interpretative disputes and provide guidance for courts, arbitral tribunals, and contracting parties. International arbitration also offers a strategic mechanism for managing jurisdictional differences and improving cross-border enforceability. Nevertheless, contractual autonomy cannot operate independently of mandatory rules and public policy limitations. The study concludes that greater harmonization of legal standards, precise contractual drafting, and informed selection of dispute-resolution mechanisms are essential to promote justice, efficiency, and legal certainty in international trade.

    Keywords

  • choice of law
  • digital globalization
  • international arbitration
  • international trade contracts
  • legal certainty

References

  1. Adhiwisaksana, Muhammad Faqih and Allagan, Tiurma Mangihut Pitta (2023) "Competent Forum and Applicable Law in Personal Data Protection with a Foreign Element," Indonesian Journal of International Law: Vol. 20: No. 3, Article 2. Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/ vol20/iss3/2.
  2. Almakky, Rawa, “The Role of International Organisations in The Development of International Law: An Analytical Assessment of The United Nations”, Law and World, 9 (28, 2003): 40-66. https://doi.org/10.36475/9.4.4.
  3. Alter, Karen J., "The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review" (2012). Faculty Working Papers. Paper 212. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/212.
  4. Amrita Dhillon, Jamele Rigolini, “Development and the interaction of enforcement institutions, Journal of Public Economics”, Volume 95, Issues 1–2, (2011): 79-87, ISSN 0047-2727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.013.
  5. Benabed, A. (2024). International Law as a Means of Globalization, Business Internationalization and Global Economy: A Mechanism with Proclivities. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 13(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.62768/PLPA/2024/13/1/17.
  6. Benabed, A. (2024). International Law as a Means of Globalization, Business Internationalization and Global Economy: A Mechanism with Proclivities. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 13(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.62768/PLPA/2024/13/1/17.
  7. Boskovic, O. (2024). Extraterritoriality and the proposed directive on corporate sustainability due diligence, a recap. Journal of Private International Law, 20(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2024.2338622
  8. Brannigan, N. (2022). Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention. Journal of Private International Law, 18(1): 83–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2022.2057466.
  9. Carrillo, Arturo J and Jackson, Matías. "Follow the Leader? A Comparative Law Study of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation’s Impact in Latin America" ICL Journal 16, no. 2 (2022): 177-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0037.
  10. Chin, Yik-Chan, and Jingwu Zhao. 2022. "Governing Cross-Border Data Flows: International Trade Agreements and Their Limits" Laws 11, no. 4: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11040063.
  11. Christine Riefa, “Cross-Border Enforcement of Consumer Law: Looking to The Future”, A Report to UNCTAD’s Working Group on E-Commerce, Sub-Working Group 3: Cross-Border Enforcement Cooperation, (19 July 2022).
  12. Chukwuma Samuel Adesina Okoli, The significance of a forum selection agreement as an indicator of the implied choice of law in international contracts: a global comparative perspective, Uniform Law Review, Volume 28, Issue 2, June 2023, Pages 197–225, https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unad016.
  13. David Kinley, Civilising Globalisation: Human Rights and the Global Economy (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  14. Dia, Ibrahima, and Henri Atangana Ondoa. “Does Economic Freedom Improve FDI Inflows in Sub-Saharan Africa?” Journal of Economic Integration 38, no. 3 (2023): 383–410. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27242694.
  15. Dicey, A. V. and J. H. C. Morris, The Conflict of Laws, 15th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
  16. Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Jorge E. Viñuales, International Environmental Law, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018).
  17. Eken, Sena, Mohamed A. El-Erian, Susan Fennell, and Jean-Pierre Chauffour. "Achieving Growth and Stability in the Middle East and North Africa". In Growth and Stability in the Middle East and North Africa, (USA: International Monetary Fund, 1996), https://doi.org/10.5089/ 9781557755650.054.ch001.
  18. Eric Posner & John C. Yoo, "Judicial Independence in International Tribunals," 93 California Law Review 1 (2005).
  19. Fabian Teichmann, Sonia Boticiu, Bruno S. Sergi, “The risk of abuse of arbitration proceedings in jurisdictions where corruption is pervasive”, Journal of Economic Criminology, Volume 2, (2023), 100032, ISSN 2949-7914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100032.
  20. Grušić, U. “Transboundary pollution at the intersection of private and public international law”. Journal of Private International Law, 19 (3, 2023): 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2023.2294606.
  21. Gu, Weixia, Looking at Arbitration Through a Comparative Lens: General Principles and Specific Issues (November 1, 2018). The Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 164–188, 2018. , University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2019/011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3324047.
  22. Hadwiger, F. (2017). Looking to the future: mediation and arbitration procedures for global framework agreements. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(4): 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916679574.
  23. Hans Van Loon, “Hague Conference on Private International Law,” Hague Justice Journal 2, no. 2 (2007): 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00014303.
  24. Herbert KRONKE, “Methodical Freedom and Organisational Constraints in the Development of Transnational Law”, Loyola Law Review, No. 51 (2005), 287 et seq. (288-289).
  25. Hietanen-Kunwald, P., & Haapio, H. (2021). Effective dispute prevention and resolution through proactive contract design. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 5(1-2): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636211016878.
  26. Himmah, Dinda Rizqiyatul and Wibisono, Justin Gabriel (2023) "Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Court Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: An Indonesian Private International Law Perspective," Indonesian Journal of International Law: Vol. 20: No. 3, Article 4. Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/vol20/iss3/4.
  27. Howse, Robert, and Joanna Langille. “Continuity and Change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism Past, Present, and Future.” American Journal of International Law 117, no. 1 (2023): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.82.
  28. Indonesia, Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
  29. Julian D.M. Lew, Contemporary Problems in International Arbitration, London: Springer Dordrecht, 1987.
  30. ______. Lew, Loukas A. Mistelis & Stefan M. Kröll, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003).
  31. K. Goldberg, N. Pavcnik, Chapter 3, “The Effects of Trade Policy, Editor(s): Kyle Bagwell, Robert W. Staiger, Handbook of Commercial PoliNorth-Holland, Volume 1, Part A, 2016, Pages 161-206, ISSN 2214-3122, ISBN 9780444632807, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hescop.2016.04.002.
  32. Kaplow, Louis, and Steven Shavell. “Fairness versus Welfare.” Harvard Law Review 114, no. 4 (2001): 961–1388. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342642.
  33. Khalifa, Thea Mutiara. "Validity of International Sales Contracts According to the United Nations Convention on Contracts of the International Sale of Goods 1980," Journal of Private International Law Studies: Vol. 1: No. 1, Article 1, (2024).
  34. Kyove, Justine, Katerina Streltsova, Ufuoma Odibo, and Giuseppe T. Cirella. "Globalization Impact on Multinational Enterprises" World 2, no. 2, (2021): 216-230. https://doi.org/10.3390/world 2020014.
  35. Lehmann, M. (2023). Incremental international law-making: The Hague Jurisdiction Project in context. Journal of Private International Law, 19(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17441048.2023.2189077.
  36. Li, Ya-Wei (2006) "Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts: An Empirical Study," Cornell International Law Journal: Vol. 39: Iss. 3, Article 15. Available at: http://scholarship. law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol39/iss3/15.
  37. Lyytinen Lescrauwaet, Hekkert Wagner, Cheng Yoon, and Sovacool Shukla, “Adaptive Legal Frameworks and Economic Dynamics in Emerging Technologies: Navigating the Intersection for Responsible Innovation”, Law and Economics, (Volume 16, No. 3, 2022).
  38. Marta Pertegas & Brooke Adele Marshall, Harmonization Through the Draft Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Contracts, 39 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2014). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol39/iss3/2
  39. Mateusz Dolata, Gerhard Schwabe, “Moving beyond privacy and airspace safety: Guidelines for just drones in policing”, Government Information Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 4, 2023, 101874, ISSN 0740-624X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101874.
  40. Mehnaz Begum, Shabir Ahmed Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World’, Global International Relations Review, V (2022): 11–16.
  41. Merrils, John. Malcolm D. Evans (Ed). The Means of Dispute Settlement in International Law. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).
  42. Meydora Cahya Nugrahenti, Ari Hernawan, “Good Faith Principle in Indonesian Contract Law: How to Set the Definition and Its Benchmarks”, Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development 2024, 8 (10).
  43. Mills, A.”Sustainability and jurisdiction in the international civil litigation market”. Journal of Private International Law, 20 (1, 2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2024.2347717.
  44. Mohd Javaid, Abid Haleem, Ravi Pratap Singh, Rajiv Suman, Shahbaz Khan, “A review of Blockchain Technology applications for financial services, BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations”, Volume 2, Issue 3, (2022): 100073, ISSN 2772-4859, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2022.100073.
  45. Morgan, Michael C. Huang, Michelle Voyer, Dominique Benzaken, and Atsushi Watanabe, Blue Economy and Blue Finance Toward Sustainable Development and Ocean Governance (Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2022).
  46. North, Peter and J. J. Fawcett, Cheshire and North’s Private International Law, 14th ed. (London: Butterworths, 1999).
  47. Okoli, C. S. A., & Yekini, A. “Implied jurisdiction agreements in international commercial contracts: a global comparative perspective”. Journal of Private International Law, 19 (3), (2023); 321–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2023.2294615.
  48. Ordonez-Ponce, E., Clarke, A. and MacDonald, A. (2021), "Business contributions to the sustainable development goals through community sustainability partnerships", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 1239-1267. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2020-0068.
  49. Oto-Peralías, Daniel, and Diego Romero-Ávila. “The Distribution of Legal Traditions around the World: A Contribution to the Legal-Origins Theory.” The Journal of Law & Economics 57, no. 3 (2014): 561–628. https://doi.org/10.1086/676556.
  50. Patunru, A. A. (2023). Trade Policy in Indonesia: Between Ambivalence, Pragmatism and Nationalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59 (3, 2023), 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2023.2282821.
  51. Petricevic, O., Teece, D.J. The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. J Int Bus Stud 50, 1487–1512 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00269-x.
  52. Pilar P. Viscasillas, Applicable Law, the CISG, and the Future Convention on International Commercial Contracts, 58 Vill. L. Rev. 733 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova. edu/vlr/vol58/iss4/15.
  53. Raymond M. Auerback, Governing Law Issues in International Financial Transactions, 27 INT'L L. 303 (1993) https://scholar.smu.edu/til/vol27/iss2/2.
  54. Ronald A. Brand, The Rome I Regulation Rules on Party Autonomy for Choice of Law: A U.S. Perspective, Unpublished (2011). https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/454.
  55. Stuart D. Levi & Alex B. Lipton, An Introduction to Smart Contracts and Their Potential and Inherent Limitations, HARVARD LAW SCHOOL FORUM ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL REGULATION (May 26, 2018), http://perma.cc/UM6E-8WU8.
  56. Svantesson, “The (Uneasy) Relationship between the HCCH and Information Technology,” in The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, ed. Thomas John, Rishi Gulati, and Ben Koehler (Cheltenham, Glouchestershire, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020).
  57. Theimer, L. (2023). Protection against the breach of choice of court agreements: A comparative analysis of remedies in English and German courts. Journal of Private International Law, 19(2): 208–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2023.2239007.
  58. Tiffany Ng, Choice of Procedural Law in International Commercial Arbitration: Providing "Proper Notice" to a Foreign Party to Ensure That the Arbitral Award Can Be Enforced, 10 Hastings Bus. L.J. 491 (2014). https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol10/ iss2/6.
  59. Tom Ruys, Cedric Ryngaert, Secondary Sanctions: A Weapon out of Control? The International Legality of, and European Responses to, US Secondary Sanctions, British Yearbook of International Law, 2020; braa007, https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/braa007.
  60. Tractenberg, Craig R. “Nuts and Bolts of International Arbitration.” Franchise Law Journal 38, no. 3 (2019): 451–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27172618.
  61. Ubink, Janine, Thomas McInerney, Customary Justice: Perspectives on Legal Empowerment (Rome: International Development Law Organization (IDLO), 2011).
  62. Ward, T., & Plenderleith Ferguson, A. (2024). Proof of foreign law: a reduced role for expert evidence? Journal of Private International Law, 20(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17441048.2024.2347720.
  63. Warrouw, Adolf (2021) "Fundamental Changes of International Economic Law: Challenges Toward Legal System Based on Fairness and Human Values," Indonesian Journal of International Law: Vol. 7: No. 1, Article 3, (2021). Doi: 10.17304/Ijil.Vol7.1.227 https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ ijil/vol7/iss1/3.
  64. Ying Chen, Yuning Gao, Comparative analysis of digital trade development strategies and governance approaches, Journal of Digital Economy, Volume 1, Issue 3, (2022): 227-238, ISSN 2773-0670, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2023.02.001.
Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 11 Number 1 September 2026

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Sugeng Sugeng

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.