Main Article Content

Abstract

The rise of AI as a creator challenges patent law's human-centered perspective, which exclusively sees creators. AI innovations aren't covered by Indonesia's Patent Law No. 13 of 2016. The national patent system is confusing concerning who invented, owns, and is liable. This paper examines the normative opportunities and problems of revising Indonesia's patent system to include AI-generated ideas while retaining legal clarity, equity, and international intellectual property norms. This work uses normative and comparative legal analysis to support a progressive patent system reform in Indonesia by introducing a hybrid inventorship model that recognizes human–AI collaboration. This study uses statutory, conceptual, and comparative frameworks for normative juridical research. It analyses primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including Indonesia's patent legislation, WIPO recommendations, and comparative jurisprudence from the US, EU, and China. Our study reveals that Indonesia's patent laws are still anthropocentric and unsuited for AI-generated ideas, producing legal ambiguity and insufficient innovation incentives. Some countries have human inventors but are incorporating AI-assisted inventions. Indonesia must restructure its legal system with a hybrid inventorship strategy that ensures responsibility, transparency, and technological adaption.

Keywords

artificial intelligence patent law artificial intinventorship Indonesia legal reform

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizal, M., Dewi, S., & Taryana, A. (2026). Reforming Patent Law in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 10(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v10i2.2533

References

  1. A R, SALIM MALIK. “AI Continues to Be a Game Changer in the Intellectual Property Management in India.” INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 09, no. 02 (February 1, 2025): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM41289.
  2. Aboy, Mateo, Kathleen Liddell, and Aparajita Lath. “Inventorship in the Age of AI: Examining the USPTO Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 20, no. 7 (August 5, 2025): 495–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf019.
  3. Adriani, Nukeu. “Electronic Copy Available at : Electronic Copy Available At :” Grou 23529, no. 2 (2018): 1–45.
  4. Alfiani, Francisca Romana Nanik, and Rineke Sara. “The Improvement of Digital Literacy to Secure Data and Privacy in the Digital Age.” Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) 3, no. 12 (December 20, 2024): 832–39. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v3i12.1374.
  5. Ali, Bujang, Dipo Setia Hady Akbar Jaya, RS Mohammad Al Amin BA, Muhammad Reza Fahlevi, and Acong Acong. “Legal Protection of Trade Secrets, Industrial Design And Integrated Circuit Layout Design In Indonesia.” Bacarita Law Journal 5, no. 1 (August 31, 2024): 164–74. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v5i1.14994.
  6. Barthos, Megawati. “DYSFUNCTIONAL IP INFRINGEMENTS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS UNDER INDONESIAN LAW.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. Vol. 22, 2019.
  7. Bharati, Dr. Rahul Kailas. “AI and Intellectual Property: Legal Frameworks and Future Directions.” International Journal of Law, Justice and Jurisprudence 4, no. 2 (July 1, 2024): 207–15. https://doi.org/10.22271/2790-0673.2024.v4.i2c.141.
  8. Dhannjay Singh Pundir, Bindu Jindal, Pranav Ranga, Vishant Saini, Nikhil Mahajan, Kusha, and Kumari Samridhi Pandey. “The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Intellectual Property Law: Patentability and Copyright Issues.” Metallurgical and Materials Engineering 31, no. 4 (April 16, 2025): 40–43. https://doi.org/10.63278/1394.
  9. Ding, Wen, and Shemin Deng. “The Patentability of AI-Generated Technical Solutions and Institutional Responses: Chinese Perspective vs. Other Countries.” Information 16, no. 8 (July 24, 2025): 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16080629.
  10. Disemadi, Hari Sutra, and Lu Sudirman. “REASSESSING LEGAL RECOGNITION OF AI: HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE CHALLENGE OF AI AS A LEGAL SUBJECT IN INDONESIA.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 54, no. 1 (March 27, 2025): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.1-12.
  11. Dornis, Tim W. “Artificial Intelligence and Innovation: The End of Patent Law As We Know It.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668137.
  12. ———. “Of ‘Authorless Works’ and ‘Inventions without Inventor’ – The Muddy Waters of ‘AI Autonomy’ in Intellectual Property Doctrine.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776236.
  13. Engel, Andreas. “Can a Patent Be Granted for an AI-Generated Invention?” GRUR International 69, no. 11 (November 1, 2020): 1123–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa117.
  14. Fadavi, Ahmad, and Mohsen La’l Alizadeh. “Ownership of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Works: An Overview of the Emerging Intellectual Property Challenges in the Technology Era,” n.d. https://doi.org/10.30497/law.2024.245828.3492.
  15. Fahlevi, Fiqih. “Harmonisasi Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Tantangan Dan Peluang Di Era Globalisasi.” Journal of Law, Education and Business 2, no. 2 (September 30, 2024): 1346–53. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v2i2.3088.
  16. Ferdinan, Dominggus. “Between Biodiversity and Biopiracy: Indonesia’s Legal Approach,” June 13, 2025. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.1147.v1.
  17. Gulyamov, Said Saidakhrarovich. “AI Authorship and Ownership of Intellectual Property in Industrial Power and Control Systems.” In 2023 5th International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA), 217–21. IEEE, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/SUMMA60232.2023.10349471.
  18. Hafner, Ana, Nadja Damij, and Dolores Modic. “Augmented Intelligence for State-of-the-Art Patent Search.” In 2022 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON EUROPE), 61–66. IEEE, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCONEUROPE54743.2022.9801959.
  19. Hou, Stephen M. “International Patent Office Guidance on Artificial Intelligence Inventions.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4843648.
  20. Irawati, Irawati, Umaira Hayuning Anggayasti, Marzellina Hardiyanti, and Ni Wayan Yesi Sandiani. “Legal Protection of Ai-Generated Creative Works in the Age of Digital Disruption: An Intellectual Property Law Perspective.” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 08, no. 06 (June 21, 2025). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i6-54.
  21. Jubaidi, Didi, and Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa. “Artificial Intelligence in the Perspective of Indonesian Law: Subject or Object of Law?” Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies 50, no. 11 (November 27, 2024): 302–14. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i111655.
  22. Kazimi, Jamshid, and Harsita Thalwal. “Intellectual Property Protection in AI-Driven Innovations: A Comparative Analysis.” In 2024 First International Conference on Technological Innovations and Advance Computing (TIACOMP), 320–26. IEEE, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIACOMP64125.2024.00060.
  23. Khodyko, Yurii. “Legal Regime of Inventions Created by Artificial Intelligence.” Law, State and Telecommunications Review 16, no. 1 (May 11, 2024): 322–43. https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v16i1.48972.
  24. Levy, Haim V. “Revisiting Patent Law Paradigms: Legal, Economic, and Ethical Implications of AI-Driven Inventions in the Biosciences: Introducing the Universal Model of Augmented Invention.” Law, Ethics & Technology, August 29, 2025. https://doi.org/10.55092/let20250006.
  25. Lisaldy, Ferdinand, Ismail Ismail, and Dewi Iryani. “Lex AI: Solution for Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia.” DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, February 26, 2024, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v20i1.9632.
  26. Mantiqa, Yuka Latieful, Mulida Hayati, and Satriya Nugraha. “Generative AI In The Context Of Intellectual Property Law: Urgency, Challenges, And Legal Protection.” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 5, no. 6 (September 1, 2025): 4753–60. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2160.
  27. Matulionyte, Rita. “‘AI Is Not an Inventor’: Thaler v Comptroller of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and the Patentability of AI Inventions.” Modern Law Review 88, no. 1 (2025): 205–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12907.
  28. Mutale, Chisanga. “Crossing Frontiers: A Comparative Exploration of AI Inventorship and Ownership in Patent Law.” International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities 05, no. 11 (2024): 57–69. https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS.2024.11.5.
  29. Naripeddy, Subhash Chandra Bose, and Viswanadha Raju Thotakura. “Ethical Challenges and Solutions in the Deployment of Artificial Intelligence Sys-Tems.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023 8, no. 02 (August 4, 2025): 81–110. https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v8i02.392.
  30. Nsabimana, Innocent, and Bugingo Emmanuel. “Navigating Innovation: Legal Challenges at the Crossroads of AI and Patent Law.” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, April 26, 2025, 1434–40. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr995.
  31. Pashchenko, Oleksandr, Volodymyr Khomenko, and Tetyana Medvedovska. “ETHICAL DILEMMA OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND INNOVATION.” In DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN UKRAINE: AI, METAVERSE, AND SOCIETY 5.0, 130–35. SciFormat Publishing Inc., 2024. https://doi.org/10.69635/978-1-0690482-1-9-ch14.
  32. Prasetyo, Budi, Jaden Tan, and Rachel Chan. “Implementation of International Law Principles in Indonesian National Law.” Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law 3, no. 1 (April 22, 2025): 67–79. https://doi.org/10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2071.
  33. Putri, Andi Istiana Inayah Dwi, and Anugrah Ade Putra. “IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN PATENT SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON EFFECTIVENESS AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS.” Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO) 2, no. 3 (August 20, 2025): 3907–17. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v2i3.1208.
  34. Rahmatillah, Raihan, and Sanusi Sanusi. “PATENT PROTECTION FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES.” Student Journal of International Law 4, no. 1 (December 30, 2024): 42–56. https://doi.org/10.24815/sjil.v4i1.31473.
  35. Rai, Arti Kaur. “Machine Learning at the Patent Office: Lessons for Patents and Administrative Law.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3393942.
  36. Rama, Bagus Gede Ari, Dewa Krisna Prasada, and Kadek Julia Mahadewi. “Urgensi Pengaturan Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Bidang Hukum Hak Cipta Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtens 12, no. 2 (2023): 177.
  37. Ramli, Tasya S., Ahmad M. Ramli, Ranti F. Mayana, Ega Ramadayanti, and Rizki Fauzi. “Artificial Intelligence as Object of Intellectual Property in Indonesian Law.” Journal of World Intellectual Property 26, no. 2 (2023): 142–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12264.
  38. Rektorschek, Jan Phillip, and Tobias Baus. “Protectability and Enforceability of AI-Generated Inventions,” 459–77, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48266-4_22.
  39. Rumahorbo, Veni Theresya Fortuna, Evi, and Ivans Januardy. “Patent Protection for Artificial Intelligence as Computer-Implemented Inventions Between Indonesia and Japan.” International Journal of Science and Society 7, no. 1 (March 21, 2025): 629–40. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v7i1.978.
  40. Rusinovich, Katsiaryna. “The Intersection of AI and Intellectual Property Law: Navigating Legal Frontiers.” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 12, no. 12 (December 5, 2023): 356–57. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR231128214222.
  41. Schrön, Viktoria. Künstliche Intelligenz Im Patentrecht. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748943150.
  42. Shahzeb Akhtar. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Patent Lifecycle Management.” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology 11, no. 2 (March 25, 2025): 2194–2205. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT23112582.
  43. Shomee, Homaira Huda, Zhu Wang, Sathya N. Ravi, and Sourav Medya. “A Survey on Patent Analysis: From NLP to Multimodal AI,” June 26, 2025. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08668.
  44. Siregar, Elfrida Herawati, Cahyo Budi Utomo, and Muh Sholeh. “Pancasila in the Context of Indonesian Legal Reform: A Critical Evaluation and International Debate.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 4 (December 31, 2024). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i4.18923.
  45. Siregar, Namira Romaito, Saidin Saidin, Jelly Leviza, and Syarifah Lisa Andriati. “Urgensi Regulasi Atas Produk Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Di Indonesia.” JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 6, no. 2 (December 19, 2024): 244–52. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v6i2.3334.
  46. Stanková, Eva. “HUMAN INVENTORSHIP IN EUROPEAN PATENT LAW.” The Cambridge Law Journal 80, no. 2 (July 28, 2021): 338–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197321000507.
  47. Sudirman, Lu, Hari Sutra Disemadi, Henry Soelistyo Budi, Jihyun Park, and Ninne Zahara Silviani. “Intellectual Property Challenges for AI-Driven Creativity: A Focus on Copyright and Patents in Emerging Economies.” Lex Scientia Law Review 9, no. 1 (May 29, 2025). https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v9i1.20611.
  48. Supriati, Yanti. “Legal Protection Of Patent Rights On Artificial Intelligence Work.” Scientia 2, no. 1 (January 25, 2023): 514–16. https://doi.org/10.51773/sssh.v2i1.203.
  49. Sushil Kumar Singh, Moin Athar, Devendra, Monica Kharola Tapan Kumar Chandola, and Diwakar Das. “AI, Patent and the Threshold of Human Invention- A Legal Analysis.” Journal of Informatics Education and Research 5, no. 3 (July 21, 2025). https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v5i3.3280.
  50. Vaish, Kanishka, Rajesh Bahuguna, Samta Kathuria, Kapil Joshi, Rishika Yadav, and Rajesh Singh. “The Challenge of Recognizing Artificial Intelligence as Legal Inventor: Implications and Analysis of Patent Laws,” 299–311, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7216-6_25.
  51. Vaish, Kanishka, Poonam Rawat, Samta Kathuria, Rajesh Singh, Kapil Joshi, and Aditya Verma. “Artificial Intelligence Reducing the Intricacies of Patent Prior Art Search.” In 2023 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering Solutions (CISES), 978–82. IEEE, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISES58720.2023.10183481.
  52. Wu, J. “Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Inventorship Gap.” Russian Journal of Economics and Law 18, no. 1 (March 19, 2024): 190–216. https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2024.1.190-216.
  53. Yeti Andrias, Maria, Najamuddin Gani, Abdul Rahman Upara, and Mukti Stofel. “Hak Milik Intelektual Dalam Era Globalisasi: Tantangan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 4, no. 4 (June 2, 2024): 747–61. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2063.
  54. Zakiran, Asep Hakim, Muhammad Raihan Nugraha, and M. Pharrel Fauzhia Sya’bani Putra Faisal. “Legal Implications of AI-Generated Works on Intellectual Property Subjects and Exclusive Rights in Indonesia.” Alauddin Law Development Journal 7, no. 2 (August 16, 2025): 167–81. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v7i2.57126.
  55. Zhang, Tongyuan. “Legal Analysis and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence as an Inventor: A Study Based on UK and US Patent Law.” Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media 96, no. 1 (June 20, 2025): 115–20. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.BO24151.