THE URGENCY TO INCLUDE GENDER AS PROTECTED GROUP UNDER THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
This research will discuss exigence to assign gender as protected groups in Genocide under Rome Statute which contains about gender (indeed third gender) selective mass killing. This research is inspired from the allegation of selective mass killing to gender in Nanjing, China, India, and Indonesia which begs protection from crime of genocide. This research method used is the juridical normative approach method. The research is conducted by analyzing the data gained from library studies and international conventions related to International Criminal Law. The specification of research is done by describing the related legislations associated with the legal theory and practice of implementing an object of research. The result of this research shows that the gender has similar characteristics exclusive groups as the protected groups under article 6 Rome Statute. What the result of that based on article 9 Rome Statute, amendment protected group is possible to do.
Keywords: Gender, Genocide, International Criminal Court
Abstrak
Penelitian ini akan membahas urgensi untuk menambahkan gender sebagai kelompok yang dilindungi dalam kejahatan genosida yang diatur di bawah ketentuan Statuta Roma terkait pembantaian berpreferensi gender (termasuk gender ketiga). Penelitian ini terinspirasi dari adanya dugaan pembantaian selektif gender di Nanking, Tiongkok, India, bahkan Indonesia yang membutuhkan perlindungan dari ketentuan genosida. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menganalisis data yang diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan dan studi peraturan konvensi internasional yang berkaitan dengan Hukum Pidana Internasional. Penelitian menggunakan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis yaitu menggambarkan peraturan yang dikaitkan dengan teori hukum dan praktek pelaksanaan suatu objek penelitian. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukan bahwa gender memiliki karakteristik yang sama dengan kelompok yang dilindungi dalam kejahatan genosida. Sehingga sesuai dengan Pasal 9 Statuta Roma amandemen terhadap kelompok yang dilindungi dalam kejahatan genosida dimungkinkan untuk dilakukan.
Kata Kunci: Gender, Genosida, Mahkamah Peradilan Pidana
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adam, Jones, Gendercide and Genocide, Rotledge, United Kingdom,2006.
__________, Genocide a Comprehensive Introduction, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2006.
Brandon, Ben and Max du Plessis, The Prosecution of International Crimes, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, 2005
De Brouwer, Anne-Marie, Supranational Criminal Prosecution of Sexual Violence, Intersentia, Oxford, 2005.
Ehrenreich, Barbara, Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passions of War, Metropolitan Books, New York, 1997.
Iris, Chang,The Rape of Nanjing: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War Two, Penguin, London, 1998.
Jonnasonh, Kurt and Karen Bjornson. Genocide and Gross Human Rights Violations, NJ Transaction Publisher, New Brunswick, 1998.
Jorgensen, Nina H. B., The Responsibility of States for International Crimes, Oxford Monographs in International Law, London, 2006.
Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Bina Aksara, Jakarta, 1987.
Otto, Triftererrer /Kai Ambos, The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Collaboration C.H Beck-Hart-Nomos Gottingen, 2015.
Pelras Christian, The Bugis, Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 1996
William, Schabas A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Oxford University Press, London, 2016.
Zou, Chi, (et.al.), Son preference and sex-selective abortion in China: informing policy options, London: Springer, 2010.
Other Documents
Anne Mary Warren, “A Reply to Holmes on Gendercide”, Bioethics Journal, Volume 1, Issue 1, 1987.
Arman Murat Necip, “The Concept of Ethnic Cleansing: A Cautious Quest for Justice”, Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, Volume 1, 2011.
Candace West & Don H. Zimmerman, “Doing Gender”, Gender and Society, Volume 1, Issue 2, 1967.
Grench Victor, and Juliano Mamo, “Gendercide: a Review of the Missing Women”, Medical Journal University of Malta, 2014.
James Yin and Shi Young, “The Rape of Nanking: An Undeniable History in Photographs”. Chicago. IL: Triumph, 1998.
Krystna Palonka, “Gendercide Current Legacy of Demography Control: China and India”, E-Leader, 2017.
Marloka Veronikia. “One Child Policy in China”, University of Iceland School of Humanities, 2018.
Mary Zeis Stange Carol K. “The Multimedia Encyclopedia of Women in Today’s World”, SAGE Publication, 2012.
Michael A. Hogg, “Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts”, Academy of Management, Volume 25, Issue 1, 2000.
Reshma M.A & Dr. A. Ramegowda, “Dowry-The Cancer of Society”, Journal of Humanities and Social Science Oxford University, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2013.
Samantha Ufret, “No One Wants a Baby Girl: Analyzing Gendercide in China and India”, Global Majority E-Journal University of Washington. DC, Volume 5, 2014,
Schabas A William, “Groups Protected by the Genocide Convention: Conflicting Interpretations from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda”, Journal of International & Comparative Law, Volume 6, 1998.
Barbara Harvey Sillars, “Tradition, Islam, and Rebellion: South Sulawesi 1950-1965”, Dissertation to achieve PhD in Cornell University, 1974.
Loise Ridley, The Holocaust’s Forgotten Victims: The 5 Million Non-Jewish People Killed by the Nazi’s, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/holocaust-non-jewish-victims_n_6555604, accessed at 24 April 2019.
Peter Kaufman, The Birth Lottery and Global Inequality Everyday Sociology, January 2015.
Population Research Institute “China Announces End of One Child Policy”, https://www.pop.org/china-announces-end-of-one-child-policy/, accessed on 20 April 2019.
Siasat di Tengah Tarian para Bissu: Sebuah Catatan untuk gerakan LGBT di Indonesia, http://www.gusdurian.net/id/article/headline/Siasat-di-Tengah-Tarian-Para-Bissu%20/, accessed on 25 April 2019.
The Guardian “Bosnian Serb warlord Ratko Mladic disrupts geniced verdict hearing”, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/21/ratko-mladic-bosnian-serb-genocide-war-crimes, accessed on 19 January 2018.
Legal Documents
Akayesu, Judgment of the Trial Chamber I ICTR, ICTR-96-4-T, 2 September 1998.
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
International Covenant Civil and Political Rights
Kayashema, Judgment of the Trial Chamber ICTR, ICTR-95-I-T, May 21, 1999.
Musema, Judgment of the Trial Chamber ICTR, ICTR-96-13-A, 27 January 2000.
Penal Code (France).
Pre-Trial Chamber 1, Prosecutor v. Omar Al Bashir, No. ICC-02/05-01/09
Prosecutor v. Krstic´, note 26, Paras. 15–16
Rome Statute
Rutaganda, Judgment of the Trial Chamber I ICTR, ICTR-96-3-T, 6 December 1999.
Undang-Undang No. 26 of 2000 tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia.