ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan has 29 reviewers to help check the substance of the article. All submitted manuscripts are going through a double-blind peer review process be reviewed by two reviewers (double anonymous peer review) on their historical experience in reviewing manuscript or based on their field of specialization.. Those papers are read by editorial members (upon field of specialization) and will be screened by Managing Editor to meet necessary criteria of JPHP publication. Then editorial board make a decision upon the reviewers comments or advice. Reviewers give their assessment on originality, clarity of presentation, contribution to the field/science, JPHP has four kind of decisions:

1. Accepted, as it is
2. Accepted by Minor Revisions(let authors revised with stipulated time)
3. Accepted by Major Revisions(let authors revised with stipulated time)
4. Rejected(generally, on grounds of outside of scope and aim, major technical description problems, lack of clarity of presentation)

For checking Plagiarism, Editorial Board will screen plagiarism with using Turnitin Program. If it is found plagiarism indication (above 30%), editorial board will reject manuscript immediately.