Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses criminal acts with the characteristics of a large number of victims and losses, one of which is the case of PT First Travel and Abu Tour with the same motive and article being charged. For the purposes of examining criminal cases since the preliminary examination stage, the process of confiscating evidence has been carried out, including goods which are the object of a crime, proceeds of a crime and other goods related to a crime, including goods in bankruptcy confiscation. The issues discussed are the application of the status of evidence in criminal cases related to bankruptcy confiscated goods in a judge's decision and efforts to return evidence in meeting the victim's loss due to a crime. Using the normative juridical research method, it was concluded that the consideration of judges, which is one of the most important aspects in determining the realization of the value of a judge's decision, was not carried out carefully and thoroughly, one of which was in decisions 3096 K/Pid.Sus/2018 and 3127 K/PID.SUS/2019 which makes no sense at all. Efforts are needed to return the confiscated evidence from the victim to overcome the losses suffered, in several ways, namely improving the search and filing administration system for evidence subject to confiscation from the investigation stage so that the case files at the prosecutor's office are included if there is already a bankruptcy confiscation.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- DAFTAR PUSTAKA
- Buku
- Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (edisi revisi), cet.1. : Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2001.
- Fred. B. G. Tumbuan, lampiran makalah Menelaah Konsep Dasar dan Aspek Hukum Kepailitan, Prosiding Rangkaian Lokakarya Terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya 2004 Kepailitan dan Transfer Aset Secara Melawan Hukum, Cetakan Pertama Pusat Kajian Hukum, Jakarta: 2005
- Jono, Hukum Kepailitan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2013
- Kadir Husin dan Budi Rizki Husein, Sistem Peradilan Pi dana di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2016
- Lilik Mulyadi, Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2014
- M. Hadi Shubhan, Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Pengadilan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta: 2012
- Man S. Sastrawidjaja, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung: 2014
- Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Dagang, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2015
- Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP; Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2014.
- Jurnal
- Juditia Damlah, “Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaraan Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004”, Jurnal Lex Crimen Vol. VI, 2017
- Ragga Bimantara, “Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Perseroan Melalui Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Nama Pribadi”, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol 3 No 2, Maret 2019.
- Siti Hapsah Isfardiyana, “Sita Umum Kepailitan Mendahului Sita Pidana dalam Pemberesan HartaPailit”, Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2016
- Sumber lain
- Ambaranie Nadia Kemala Movanita, Ini 7 Pengakuan Menarik Para Terdakwa Kasus First Travel", Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/04/24/10414071/ini-7-pengakuan-menarik-para-terdakwa-kasus-first-travel?page=all. on 6 November 2020.
- Flora Dianti, Apa Perbedaan Alat Bukti dengan Barang Bukti?. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4e 8ec99e4d2ae/apa-perbedaan-alat-bukti-dengan-barang- bukti- on 2 November 2020.
- Hendra Cipto , Reni Susanti, “Sembunyikan Uang Jamaah, Istri Bos Abu Tours JadiTersangka". diakses dari https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/07/12/13550491/sembunyikan-uang-jamaah-istri-bos-abu-tours-jadi-tersangka. Pada tanggal 6 November 2020
- Himawan, 9 Mei 2018, “Nilai Tagihan Kreditur PKPU Abu Tours Capai Rp1 Triliun”,http://news.rakyatku. com/read/100477/2018/05/09/nilai-tagihan-krediturpkpu-abu-tours-capai-rp1-triliun, accessed on 11 February 2020 at 14.32 (GMT+7)
- Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS), Polemik Perampasan Asset kasus First Travel oleh Negara:Bagaimana Agar Korban Bisa Memperoleh Gantirugi, retrieved from https://theconversation.com/polemik-perampasan-aset-kasus-first-travel-oleh-negara-bagaimana-agar-korban-bisa-memperoleh-ganti-rugi-127447 on 6 November 2020
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Buku
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (edisi revisi), cet.1. : Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2001.
Fred. B. G. Tumbuan, lampiran makalah Menelaah Konsep Dasar dan Aspek Hukum Kepailitan, Prosiding Rangkaian Lokakarya Terbatas Masalah-Masalah Kepailitan dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya 2004 Kepailitan dan Transfer Aset Secara Melawan Hukum, Cetakan Pertama Pusat Kajian Hukum, Jakarta: 2005
Jono, Hukum Kepailitan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2013
Kadir Husin dan Budi Rizki Husein, Sistem Peradilan Pi dana di Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2016
Lilik Mulyadi, Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2014
M. Hadi Shubhan, Hukum Kepailitan Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Pengadilan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta: 2012
Man S. Sastrawidjaja, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Alumni, Bandung: 2014
Sentosa Sembiring, Hukum Dagang, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung: 2015
Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP; Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta: 2014.
Jurnal
Juditia Damlah, “Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaraan Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004”, Jurnal Lex Crimen Vol. VI, 2017
Ragga Bimantara, “Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Perseroan Melalui Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Nama Pribadi”, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol 3 No 2, Maret 2019.
Siti Hapsah Isfardiyana, “Sita Umum Kepailitan Mendahului Sita Pidana dalam Pemberesan HartaPailit”, Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2016
Sumber lain
Ambaranie Nadia Kemala Movanita, Ini 7 Pengakuan Menarik Para Terdakwa Kasus First Travel", Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/04/24/10414071/ini-7-pengakuan-menarik-para-terdakwa-kasus-first-travel?page=all. on 6 November 2020.
Flora Dianti, Apa Perbedaan Alat Bukti dengan Barang Bukti?. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4e 8ec99e4d2ae/apa-perbedaan-alat-bukti-dengan-barang- bukti- on 2 November 2020.
Hendra Cipto , Reni Susanti, “Sembunyikan Uang Jamaah, Istri Bos Abu Tours JadiTersangka". diakses dari https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/07/12/13550491/sembunyikan-uang-jamaah-istri-bos-abu-tours-jadi-tersangka. Pada tanggal 6 November 2020
Himawan, 9 Mei 2018, “Nilai Tagihan Kreditur PKPU Abu Tours Capai Rp1 Triliun”,http://news.rakyatku. com/read/100477/2018/05/09/nilai-tagihan-krediturpkpu-abu-tours-capai-rp1-triliun, accessed on 11 February 2020 at 14.32 (GMT+7)
Indonesia Judicial Research Society (IJRS), Polemik Perampasan Asset kasus First Travel oleh Negara:Bagaimana Agar Korban Bisa Memperoleh Gantirugi, retrieved from https://theconversation.com/polemik-perampasan-aset-kasus-first-travel-oleh-negara-bagaimana-agar-korban-bisa-memperoleh-ganti-rugi-127447 on 6 November 2020