Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 234 Download : 115

Main Article Content

Abstract

In Gayo society, khalwat (illicit sexual relations) is punishable by customary sanctions in the form of parak (exile). However, in practice in several villages in Central Aceh Regency, perpetrators of khalwat are often immediately subjected to severe parak sanctions without first going through a stage of counselling or written warnings. This study aims to determine the process of applying customary sanctions and the considerations of the sarak opat in imposing sanctions on perpetrators of khalwat. The novelty of this research lies in the integration between the values of Gayo customary law and the principle of restorative justice in the context of non-litigation law enforcement based on local wisdom. This type of research is empirical law using primary data obtained directly from the field and secondary data or reference data. The results indicate that the implementation of parak sanctions is carried out through a structured process, starting with complaints, mediation, customary court hearings, and then implementing the decision. The primary considerations for Sarak Opat include religious, legal, socio-cultural, and public security aspects. However, violations of customary procedures were found in the form of exile without prior warning, potentially raising substantive justice issues.

Keywords

Consideration Jarimah Khalwat Sanction Parak Sarak Opat

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Suhartini, S., Surya, A., & Ramadhan, A. (2026). Sarak Opat Considerations in the Application of Parak Customary Sanctions (Exile) Against Jarimah Khalwat Perpetrators. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 10(2), 166-178. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v10i2.1997
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Achmad Surya, dan Hasan Basri. “Eksistensi Sanksi Adat Jeret Naru Dalam Masyarakat Gayo Di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 4 (2020): 359–368, https://doi:10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.359-368.
  2. Achmad Surya, dan Suhartini, “Efektivitas Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Lembaga Adat (Sarak Opat),” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 26, no. 1 (2019): 91-112, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art5.
  3. Achmad Surya, Suhartini, dan Ruslan Hakim, “Authority of Sarak Opat in Settlement of Environmental Pollution Cases,” Widya Yuridika 7, no. 1 (2024): 85–92, https://doi:10.31328/wy.v7i1.4672.
  4. Amir Syam, “Lembaga Adat Sarak Opat Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Kampung,” RESAM Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2019): 76–94, https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v5i2.32.
  5. Arfiansyah, “The Contemporary Changes and Uses of Adat in Gayo Society, Indonesia.” Heritage of Nusantara : International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage 10, no. 1 (2021): 35-67, https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v10i1.620.
  6. Dedisyah Putra, “Kedudukan Hukum Adat Dalam Hukum Islam Tentang Pelaku Maksiat Tertentu,” Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial 9, no. 1 (2023): 12–30, https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v9i1.7776.
  7. Erlina Sinaga, “Politik Legislasi Hukum Tidak Tertulis Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Nasional,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 8, no. 1 (2019): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i1.306.
  8. Ihsan, “Efektivitas Parak Sebagai Sanksi Adat,” RESAM Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2019): 95-113, https://doi.org/10.32661/resam.v5i2.28.
  9. Jamhir, “Penyelesaian Kasus Jarimah Ikhtilat Di Gayo Menurut Hukum Islam,” Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial 5, no. 2 (2020): 54–71, https://doi:10.22373/justisia.v5i2.8454.
  10. Lisa Hayati, Husamuddin Mz, dan Sumardi Efendi, “Sanksi Adat Terhadap Jarimah Khalwat perspektif Fikih Jinayah: Studi di Gampong Tungkop Kecamatan Sungai Mas Kabupaten Aceh Barat,” Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin 1, no. 2 (2024): 151–165, https://doi:10.71153/jimmi.v1i2.107.
  11. Maifa Fitri, “Peran dan Fungsi Kedudukan Sarak Opat dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Di Kampung,” TANFIDZIY : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Siyasah 2, no. 1 (2023): 20–36, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47766/tanfidziy.v2i1.1804.
  12. Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).
  13. Muhammad Ihsan, “Dualisme Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Mahkamah Syar’iyah dan Lembaga Peradilan Adat,” Tanfidziy: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Siyasah 2, no. 1, (2023): 1-19, https://doi.org/10.47766/tanfidziy.v2i1.1558.
  14. Nur Rochaeti, dan Rahmi Dwi Sutanti, “Kontribusi Peradilan Adat Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 3 (2018): 198–214, https://doi:10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214.
  15. Puger Abdul Khaliq, dan Laila Kholid Alfirdaus, “Pelemahan Peran Sarak Opat Dalam Pemerintahan Kampung Kute Rayang Kecamatan Linge Kabupaten Aceh Tengah,” Journal of Politic and Government Studies 11, no. 3 (2022): 100-110, https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/34609.
  16. Qanun Aceh Nomor 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Lembaga Adat
  17. Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat
  18. Qanun Aceh Nomor 9 Tahun 2008 tentang Pembinaan Kehidupan Adat dan Adat Istiadat
  19. Qanun Kabupaten Aceh Tengah Nomor 10 Tahun 2002 tentang Hukum Adat Gayo
  20. Rahmina, Teuku Muttaqin Mansur, dan M Adli Abdullah, “Efektivitas Penerapan Sanksi Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Peradilan Adat Gayo Di Aceh Tengah,” Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin 2, no. 3 (2019): 314–322, https://doi:10.52626/jg.v2i3.65.
  21. Rosdiana, dan Ulum Janah, “Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Perzinaan Pada Masyarakat Kutai Adat Lawas,” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 53–73, https://doi:10.23920/jbmh.v5i1.14.
  22. Suhartini, and Achmad Surya, “Reconstruction of Sumang Customs in Gayo Community as An Effort to Prevent Underage Marriage,” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum 23, no. 2 (2024): 1512–1526, https://doi:10.31941/pj.v23i2.3139.
  23. Suhartini, and Achmad Surya, “The Role of the Sarak Opat in Resolving Minor Crimes,” Jurnal Media Hukum 29, no. 2 (2022): 146–159, https://doi:10.18196/jmh.v29i2.14471.
  24. Suhartini, dan Syandi Rama Sabekti, “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Zina Melalui Mediasi Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam,” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 72-87, https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jbmh/article/view/66.
  25. Syukri, “The Gayo People Philosophy: Genap-Mupakat and Social Harmonization in Central Aceh,” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 17, no. 2 (2023): 268–292, https://doi:10.15642/islamica.2023.17.2.268-292.
  26. Syukri, Muhammad Aswin, and Arifinsyah, “The Sarak Opat Government System and the Relevance in the Implementation of Regional Autonomy in Central Aceh Indonesia,” Dalam Proceedings of the 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018), Banda Aceh, Indonesia: Atlantis Press, 2019, https://doi:10.2991/agc-18.2019.21.
  27. Syukri, Sarak Opat Sistem Pemerintahan Tanah Gayo Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah (Jakarta: Hijri Pustaka Utama, 2006).
  28. Tasrizal, dan Mahdi, “Tuha Peut Sebagai Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Masyarakat Aceh Utara Dan Kota Lhokseumawe,” CONSTITUO : Journal of State and Political Law Research 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–10. https://doi:10.47498/constituo.v3i1.2996.
  29. Titik Triwulan Tutik, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya, 2006).
  30. Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  31. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh
  32. Valentina Shanty, Adwani Adwani, and Azhari Yahya, “Indigenous Sanction of Expulsion in Central Aceh District (Human Rights Perspective),” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 13, no. 2 (2018): 254–272, https://doi:10.19105/al-lhkam.v13i2.1828.
  33. Zulkarnain, Irfan Tamwifi, and Eliyyil Akbar, “Religious Moderation Education Based on Local Wisdom ‘Sarak Opat’ of the Gayo Tribe,” EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran 6, no. 1 (2025): 475–484, https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1437.