Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pembentukan Undang-Undang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) merupakan angin segar bagi para pihak yang menggunakan arbitrase dalam menjamin kepastian hukum dalam menyelenggarakan lembaga ini di Indonesia. UU Arbitrase dan APS mengatur putusan arbitrase internasional dalam rangka mengakomodir arbitrase internasional. Permasalahan timbul terhadap klasifikasi putusan arbitrase internasional karena rumusan definisi putusan arbitrase internasional dalam UU Arbitrase dan APS. Definisi yang diatur berbeda dengan definisi Arbitrase internasional dalam Hukum Internasional yakni United Nations Commission On Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). Artikel ini akan membahas mengenai implikasi penerapan klasifikasi menurut hukum Indonesia terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus yang memiliki unsur internasional. Menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis-normatif dalam menganalisa kasus untuk menjawab permasalahan dalam artikel ini dengan menitikberatkan pada data kepustakaan dan data primer yang berkaitan dengan hukum arbitrase internasional. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat ketidaksesuaian dalam penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS, hukum internasional dan praktik-praktik negara lain (Brunei Darussalam, Singapura dan Hong Kong). Penerapan klasifikasi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional menurut UU Arbitrase dan APS berimplikasi terhadap kewenangan pengadilan domestik dengan meluasnya kewenangan pengadilan domestik terhadap kasus arbitrase yang memiliki unsur asing.
Kata kunci: arbitrase internasional; klasifikasi putusan arbitrase; UNCITRAL Model Law.
ABSTRACT
The establishment of the Indonesian Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (ADS) act becomes a new hope for parties who seek legal certainity using arbitration. The act accomodates international arbitration awards by putting the recognition for the awards into its scope of application. The problem arises in regards with the classification of international arbitration. The definition of international arbitration award under the act is different with international arbitration definition under International Law, espescially wit definition from United Nations Commission on Interational Trade Law: Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with Amendments as Adopted in 2006 (UNCITRAL Model Law). This article will discuss the issue arises on how the implication of using Indonesian classification towards the authority of domestic court in arbitration with foreign elements cases. The author used juridical-normative and case-analysing approach to further examine the problems in this thesis by researching on literary data and secondary data that are related to international commercial arbitration law. To conclude, there is incompatibility between Indonesian classification of International Arbitration, with intenational law and parctices of other countries (Brunei darussalam, Singapore and Hong Kong). The implication of the classification in Indonesian Arbitration and ADS is that domestic court jurisdiction expands to arbitration with foreign element cases.
Keywords: classification of arbitration award; international arbitration award; UNCITRAL Model Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.4
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Buku
- Huala Adolf, Dasar-Dasar Prinsip & Filosofi Arbitrase, Keni Media, Bandung: 2014.
- International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA). ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook For Judges .Den Haag: ICCA. 2014.
- Jurnal
- Albert Jan van den Berg, When Is an Arbitral Award Nondomestic Under the New York Convention of 1958?. 6 Pace L. Rev. 25. 1985.
- BANI Arbitration Center, Indonesia Arbitration: Quarterly Newsletter No. 12/2013, BANI Arbitartion Center, Jakarta: 2013.
- Jian Zhou, Judicial Intervention In International Arbitration : A Comparative Study Of The Scope Of The New York Convention In U.S. And Chinese Courts, 2006.
- Jose Angelo Estrella Faria, Legal Harmonization Through Model Law : The Experience of The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).
. [diakses pada 11/07/2016] - M. Husseyn Umar, Pokok-pokok Masalah Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia. 2010
- Mary E. McNerney and Carlos A. Espluglues. International Commercial Arbitration: the UNCITRAL Model Law. 9 BC. Int’l & Comp.L. Rev. 47. 1986.
- Peraturan Perundang-undangan
- Undang-undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
References
Buku
Huala Adolf, Dasar-Dasar Prinsip & Filosofi Arbitrase, Keni Media, Bandung: 2014.
International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA). ICCA’s Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook For Judges .Den Haag: ICCA. 2014.
Jurnal
Albert Jan van den Berg, When Is an Arbitral Award Nondomestic Under the New York Convention of 1958?. 6 Pace L. Rev. 25. 1985.
BANI Arbitration Center, Indonesia Arbitration: Quarterly Newsletter No. 12/2013, BANI Arbitartion Center, Jakarta: 2013.
Jian Zhou, Judicial Intervention In International Arbitration : A Comparative Study Of The Scope Of The New York Convention In U.S. And Chinese Courts, 2006.
Jose Angelo Estrella Faria, Legal Harmonization Through Model Law : The Experience of The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).
M. Husseyn Umar, Pokok-pokok Masalah Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia. 2010
Mary E. McNerney and Carlos A. Espluglues. International Commercial Arbitration: the UNCITRAL Model Law. 9 BC. Int’l & Comp.L. Rev. 47. 1986.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.