Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 306 Download : 313

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesian Marks Law in Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a has protected famous people from using their names or abbreviations as marks by other parties without permission. However, that law has not protected famous people from suing for cancellation and/or compensation against a party using the name and/or abbreviation of his name as a mark. Using the normative juridical method, the provisions on the legal basis for famous people to sue other parties who use their names or their abbreviations as marks are analyzed. This article examines legal principles and legal theories that can be used to resolve that. The results of the study conclude that the legal principles that can be used to provide a legal basis for famous people in suing other parties without permission to use their names or abbreviations as marks are the principle of good faith, the principle of legal certainty, the principle of point d' interest, point d' action, and the principle of legitima persona stands in judicio. Legal theories that can provide a legal basis for famous people in suing other parties without permission to use their names or abbreviations as marks are the welfare state theory, development law theory, and the theory of intellectual property protection from Robert M. Sherwood.

Keywords

good faith famous person legal certainty marks right to sue

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Amirulloh, M., Novianty Muchtar, H., & Muhtadin, D. (2023). FILLING THE LEGAL VACUUM OF INDONESIAN MARKS LAW: THE LEGAL STANDING OF A FAMOUS PERSON IN SUING MARKS INFRINGEMENT. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(2), 272-287. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jbmh/article/view/951
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Jurnal
  2. Arfi Dyah Chatarina, ‘Perlindungan Pemilik Merek Pertama Pada Sistem Konstitutif’ (2019) 16 (2) Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat.
  3. Amila Desiani Dkk, ‘Implementasi Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Pembatalan Transaksi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Situs Belanja Elektronik’ (2018) 2 (1) Acta Diurnal Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan dan ke-PPAT-an
  4. Amirulloh Muhamad, ‘Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Terkait Perlindungan Nama Orang Terkenal Sebagai Nama Domain Di Indonesia’ (2016) 18 (2) Jurnal Sosiohumaniora.
  5. Grace Chan, ‘Domain Name Protection in Hong Kong: Flaws and Proposals for Reform’ (2005) 13 (4) International Journal of Law and Information Technology.
  6. Haedah Faradz, ‘Perlindungan Hak Atas Merek’ (2008) 3 (1) Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 3.
  7. Helitha Novianty Muchtar DKK, ‘Penerapan Prinsip Yurisdiksi In Rem (Forum Rei Sitae) Dalam Gugatan Orang Terkenal Terhadap Cybersquatter Di Indonesia’ (2018) 7 (1) Jurnal RechtsVinding
  8. Humaedi Abdurahman, ‘Asas First To File Principal Dalam Kasus Hak Merek Nama Terkenal Bensu’ (2020) 3 (2) Jurnal Hukum Aktualita .
  9. Mas Rahmah, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Merek Menurut UU 15 /2001’ (2004) 19 (5) Jurnal Yuridika
  10. Mostafa Bakhtiarvand, ‘Legal Nature and Protection of Domain Names with Emphasis on Iranian Law’ (2016) 21 (1) Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.
  11. Muhamad Amirulloh, ‘Legal Principles Related Famous Person‘s Name Protection As A Domain Names in Indonesia’ (2016) 18 (2) Sosiohumaniora.
  12. Muhamad Amirulloh, ‘Implementation of Alter Ego Principles Regarding Patent Ownership by Employee Inventors in Indonesia’ (2020) 83 (3) TEST Engineering and Management.
  13. Oksidelfa Yanto, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Uu No. 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek : Sisi Lain Kelemahan Sistem First To File Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI)’ (2008) 3 (1) ADIL.
  14. Peter K Yu, ‘When the Chinese Intellectual Property System Hits 35’ (2018) 8 (3) Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property.
  15. Ryan R Owens, ‘Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution after Sallen v. Corinthians Licenciamentos & Barcelona.Com, Inc. v. Excelentisimo Ayuntameiento De Barcelona’, (2003) Vol. 18 Is Berkeley Technology Law Journal.
  16. S Burshtein, ‘Is a Domain Name Property?’ (2005) 1 (3) Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.
  17. Sumanjeet Singh, ‘The State of IP Protection, Exploitation and Valuation: Evidence from Select Indian Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)’ (2018) 4 (2) Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies.
  18. Swati Deva, ‘What’s in a Name? Disputes Relating to Domain Names in India’ (2005) 19 (2) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology
  19. Yee Fen Lim, ‘Internet Governance, Resolving the Unresolvable: Trademark Law and Internet Domain Names’ (2002) 16 (2) International Review of Law, Computers & Technology.
  20. Yulia Agustin, ‘Penguasaan Tata Bahasa Dan Berpikir Logik Serta Kemampuan Menulis Artikel Ilmiah’ (2015) II Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan.
  21. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  22. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis
  23. Keputusan Presiden Nomor 177 Tahun 2000 tentang Susunan Organisasi Dan Tugas Departemen
  24. Peraturan Presiden No. 44 Tahun 2015 tentang Kementerian Hukum dan HAM
  25. Putusan
  26. Samuel Onsu v Benny Sujono, Putusan Pn Jakarta Pusat
  27. 57/Pdt.Sus-Hki/Merek/2019/Pn Niaga Jkt.Pst, Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat, 13 Januari 2020.
  28. Website
  29. Danar H, ‘Perjalanan Danar Hadi’ accessed 6 April 2021
  30. WIPO, ‘Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China’ (2015) accessed 5 April 2021
  31. China Trademark Law, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-new-trademark-law-effect-november-1-2019/