Application of Tax and Customs Sanctions Against Debtors in Suspension of Payment and Bankruptcy Case

Main Article Content

Rio Bonang
Sarifah Ainun Jariyah
Bambang Satrianto
Eko Susanto Tejo

Abstract

Debt settlement through the mechanisms of suspension of payment and bankruptcy often comes into conflict with the state’s financial rights in the form of tax debts arising from trade, export and import activities. In relation to the application of administrative sanctions in the form of interest and fines, the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment Law states that interest and fines cannot be calculated after the debtor is declared in suspension of payment or bankrupt, while the tax and customs laws state that fines will continue to be calculated until the bill is paid in full, and coercive measures can be taken. Researchers will examine how administrative sanctions are applied to bankrupt debtors and how the mechanism for applying repressive sanctions to bankrupt debtors works? This research uses normative-empirical methods and analytical descriptive research specifications. The research results conclude that administrative sanctions for tax debts can still be applied to debtors even if they are in a state of bankruptcy can be applied to the personal assets of the taxpayer, and coercive measures can be taken. Repressive sanctions can be carried out against bankrupt debtors by officials from the Directorate General of Taxes or the Directorate General of Customs and Excise as a last resort based on the PPSP Law. The researcher provides the following suggestions: harmonization of laws and regulations is needed to prevent overlapping regulations and authorities and regulations under the law are needed to technically regulate the implementation of corporal punishment so that there is no legal vacuum.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bonang, R., Jariyah, S. A., Satrianto, B., & Tejo, E. S. (2026). Application of Tax and Customs Sanctions Against Debtors in Suspension of Payment and Bankruptcy Case. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/jphp.v7i2.2900
Section
Articles

References

Buku
Khalimi & Darma Prawira. (2022). Hukum Pajak Dan Kepabeanan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.
R. Anton Suyatno. (2012). Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang: Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Safudin, Endrik. (2021). Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Antinomi Hukum Telaah Kritis Atas Penerapaannya oleh Mahkamah Agung. Yogyakarta: Q-Media.
Sugiyono. (2012).Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.Jakarta: Alfabeta.
Waluyo, Bambang. (2002). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kartikawati, Dwi Ratna. (2021). Hukum Pajak. Tasikmalaya: CV. Elvaretta Buana.
Zainal Arifin Mochtar dan Eddy O.S. Hiariej. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum, Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Jurnal
Banakar, Reza. “Norms and Normativity in Socio-Legal Research.” In Normativity in Legal Sociology, by Reza Banakar, 215–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09650-6_11.
Diana Ayu Mardiani, Muhammad Eko Prasetiyo, Nyulistiowati Suryanti, Deviana Yuanitasari. Pilihan Domisili Yurisdiksi Dalam Permohonan PKPU Berdasarkan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis Doktrin:Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik VOLUME. 2, NO. 1, JANUARI 2024. Hlm. 114.
Mochtar, Z. A. (2015). Antinomi dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(3), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i3.112. Hlm. 336
Rahmawati, Diana. "Penerapan Penahanan (Paksa Badan) terhadap Debitor Pailit Menurut UU No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU." Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 31 Mar. 2017. Hlm. 85.
Shinta Agustina. 2015. Implementasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum. Vol. 44 No. 4. FakultasHukum. Universitas Diponegoro. Hlm. 504, https://ejournal.undip.ac.id diakses pada 23 Agustus 2018
Tejo, Eko Susanto, Hernawati RAS, and Yeti Kurniati , trans. 2025. “Application of the Principle of Balance and Justice to Debtors Who Do Not Act in Good Faith Based on Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment”. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) 13 (05): 662-76. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v13i05.lla01.
Wiwit Juliana Sari, Yeti Kurniati, & Tejo, E. S. (2024). Eksistensi Perkawinan Adat di Tengah Pengaruh Hukum Nasional: Studi Perbandingan di Beberapa Daerah Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(2), 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3304

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 1995 Tentang Kepabeanan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 1997 Tentang Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2000 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 1997 Tentang Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Tempat Penimbunan Berikat
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 65/PMK.04/2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 131/PMK.04/2018 Tentang Kawasan Berikat
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 61 Tahun 2023 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Penagihan Pajak Atas Jumlah Pajak Yang Masih Harus Dibayar

Referensi Lain
https://ortax.org/bagaimana-ketentuan-penyitaan-dalam-penagihan-pajak
https://pajak.go.id/id/artikel/uu-pailit-pajak-dan-gugatan-actio-pauliana
https://pajak.go.id/id/berita/djp-malang-gandeng-bea-cukai-jatim-lakukan-joint-collection
https://www.beacukai.go.id/berita/punya-beragam-keunggulan-ini-manfaat-fasilitas-kawasan-berikat-bagi-pengguna-jasa.html
https://www.beacukai.go.id/berita/sering-dianggap-sama-ini-tujuh-bentuk-tempat-penimbunan-berikat.html
https://www.hukumonline.com/stories/article/lt62cec83e796b0/pertanggungjawaban-pribadi-direksi-dan-kurator-atas-utang-pajak-perusahaan-pailit/
https://www.pajak.go.id/id/artikel/mendapat-surat-paksa-jangan-panik-ini-yang-harus-dilakukan
Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat
Rekaman suara 24 November 2024 direkam oleh peneliti