Articles
Application of Tax and Customs Sanctions Against Debtors in Suspension of Payment and Bankruptcy Case
Abstract
Debt settlement through the mechanisms of suspension of payment and bankruptcy often comes into conflict with the state’s financial rights in the form of tax debts arising from trade, export and import activities. In relation to the application of administrative sanctions in the form of interest and fines, the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment Law states that interest and fines cannot be calculated after the debtor is declared in suspension of payment or bankrupt, while the tax and customs laws state that fines will continue to be calculated until the bill is paid in full, and coercive measures can be taken. Researchers will examine how administrative sanctions are applied to bankrupt debtors and how the mechanism for applying repressive sanctions to bankrupt debtors works? This research uses normative-empirical methods and analytical descriptive research specifications. The research results conclude that administrative sanctions for tax debts can still be applied to debtors even if they are in a state of bankruptcy can be applied to the personal assets of the taxpayer, and coercive measures can be taken. Repressive sanctions can be carried out against bankrupt debtors by officials from the Directorate General of Taxes or the Directorate General of Customs and Excise as a last resort based on the PPSP Law. The researcher provides the following suggestions: harmonization of laws and regulations is needed to prevent overlapping regulations and authorities and regulations under the law are needed to technically regulate the implementation of corporal punishment so that there is no legal vacuum.
- bankruptcy
- customs
- tax law
Keywords
References
- Books
- Anton Suyatno, R. Pemanfaatan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang: Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Kepailitan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.
- Kartikawati, Dwi Ratna. Hukum Pajak. Tasikmalaya: CV. Elvaretta Buana, 2021. Khalimi and Darma Prawira. Hukum Pajak dan Kepabeanan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit
- Kencana, 2022.
- Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, and Eddy O. S. Hiariej. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, Teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2021.
- Safudin, Endrik. Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Antinomi Hukum Telaah Kritis Atas Penerapaannya Oleh Mahkamah Agung. Yogyakarta: Q-Media, 2021.
- Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Jakarta: Alfabeta, 2012.
- Indonesia.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 9, no. 1 (January 2023): 766–81. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v9i1.57115.
- Mardiani, Diana Ayu, Muhammad Eko Prasetiyo, and Nyulistiowati Suryanti. “Pilihan Domisili Yurisdiksi dalam Permohonan PKPU Berdasarkan Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis.” Doktrin:Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik 2, no. 1 (2024): 102–16.
- Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. Antinomi dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review 1, no. 3 (2025): Article 9. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev. v1i3.112.
- Rahmawati, Diana. “Penerapan Penahanan (Paksa Badan) terhadap Debitor Pailit Menurut UU No 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU.” Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal 2, no. 1 (March 2017): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.32801/ abc.v2i1.42.
- Sari, Wiwit Juliana, Yeti Kurniati, and Eko Susanto Tejo. “Eksistensi Perkawinan Adat di Tengah Pengaruh Hukum Nasional : Studi Perbandingan di Beberapa Daerah Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) 5, no. 2 (2024): 1257–
- 66.
- Tejo, Eko Susanto, Hernawati Ras, and Yeti Kurniati. Application of the Principle of Balance and Justice to Debtors Who Do Not Act in Good Faith Based on Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Payment. 13, no. 37 (2025): 662–76. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v13i05.lla01
- Other Sources
- Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. “DJP Malang Gandeng Bea Cukai Jatim Lakukan Joint Collection.” 2022. https://pajak.go.id/id/berita/djp-malang-gandeng-bea-cukai- jatim-lakukan-joint-collection.
- . “Mendapat Surat Paksa? Jangan Panik! Ini yang Harus Dilakukan.” 2025. https://www.pajak.go.id/id/artikel/mendapat-surat-paksa- jangan-panik-ini-yang-harus-dilakukan.
- . “UU Pailit, Pajak, dan Gugatan Actio Pauliana.” 2022.
- https://pajak.go.id/id/artikel/uu-pailit-pajak-dan-gugatan-actio-pauliana.
- Hukumonline. “Pertanggungjawaban Pribadi Direksi Dan Kurator Atas Utang Pajak Perusahaan Pailit.” 2022. http://www.hukumonline.com/stories/article/lt62ce c83e796b0/pertanggungjawaban-pribadi-direksi-dan-kurator-atas-utang-pajak- perusahaan-pailit/.
- Ortax. “Bagaimana Ketentuan Penyitaan dalam Penagihan Pajak?” 2023. https://ortax.
- org/bagaimana-ketentuan-penyitaan-dalam-penagihan-pajak.
- Journals
- Agustina, Shinta. “Keywords: Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali, Criminal Justice System. Abstrak.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44, no. 4 (2015): 503–10.
- Banakar, Reza. “Norms and Normativity in Socio-Legal Research.” In Normativity in Legal Sociology: Methodological Reflections on Law and Regulation in Late Modernity, 215–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-09650-6_11.
- Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai. “Tempat Penimbunan Berikat.” Jakarta, 2025.
- https://www.beacukai.go.id/fasilitas-tempat-penimbunan-berikat.
- I Wayan Budha Yasa. “Penalaran Hukum dan Konsep Hukum H.L.A. Hart Sebagai Solusi untuk Meredakan Gejala Antinomi dalam Penegakan Hukum di
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rio Bonang, Sarifah Ainun Jariyah, Bambang Satrianto, Eko Susanto Tejo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.