Petition for Annulment of Marriage Filed After The Expiration of The Statutory Time Limit in Relation to The Relevant Laws and Regulations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A marriage can be annulled if the parties do not meet the legal requirements for the validity of the marriage. There are several conditions that must be met in submitting a marriage annulment application, one of which is regarding the period of application which is canceled after the lapse of 6 (six) months as stipulated in Article 27 of the Marriage Law in conjunction with Article 72 KHI. The purpose of this study is to analyze and determine the validity and legal certainty of marriage annulment applications filed after the expiration of the time period along with the application of the reasons based on the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law. This research uses a normative juridical approach with descriptive analytical research specifications, reviewed through secondary data obtained from literature studies and field studies in the form of interviews. The data analysis method used is a qualitative normative. Based on the results of the study, it shows that, first, the provision of a period of 6 (six) months in Article 27 of the Marriage Law in conjunction with Article 72 KHI applies only to the reasons for annulment of marriage contained in the article which are calculated from the time the marriage is validly carried out. The granting of marriage annulment filed after the expiration of the time period is valid because, there is an alternative for the Panel of Judges to consider the reasons for violating the terms and conditions of marriage. Second, differences in interpretation of regulations related to the implementation of the expiration period cause disparities in marriage annulment decisions, resulting in inconsistencies that are felt to provide less legal certainty.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Amir Syarifuddin. (2019). Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Bambang Daru Nugroho. (2020). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Ibrahim Ahmad Harun. (2013). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Administrasi Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama.
Moch. Isnaeni. (2016). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Peter Marzuki. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sonny Dewi Judiasih. (2019). Harta Benda Perkawinan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Taufiq Hamami. (2003). Kedudukan dan Eksistensi Peradilan Agama Dalam Sistem Tata Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Supranto. (2003). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Statistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Umar Haris Sanjaya dan Aunur Rahim Faqih. (2017). Hukum Perkawinan Islam. Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
Wati Rahmi Ria. (2017). Hukum Keluarga Islam. Bandar Lampung: UNISA Pers.
Journals
Ahmad Supandi Patampari. (2020). “Konsekuensi Hukum Pembatalan Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Islam”. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan. 2(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.35673/as-hki.v2i2.894.
Andi Iswandi. (2021). “Review Pembatalan Perkawinan yang Disebabkan Penipuan pada Pengadilan Agama”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Pengkajian Islam. 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59833/QONUNI.V1I02.303.
Anist Suryani dan Kadi. (2020). “Konsep Sakinah Mawaddah Wa Rahmah Menurut M. Quraish Shihab dan Relevansinya terhadap Pendidikan Anak dalam Keluarga”. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. 1(1).
Bing Waluyo. (2020). “Sahnya Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan”. Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpppkn.v2i1.135.
Daromi dan Purwadi. (2019). “Pembatalan Perkawinan Karena Adanya Pemalsuan Identitas Suami dalam Perkawinan Poligami”. Jurnal Bedah Hukum. 3(2). https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v3i2.193.
Deni Rahmatillah. (2017). “Konsep Pembatalan Perkawinan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1947 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam” Jurnal Hukum Islam. 17(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/hi.v17i2.4985.
Khairuddin (et.al.). (2022). “Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Putusan Pembatalan Perkawinan (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta”. Jurnal Widya Pranata Hukum. 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v4i1.586.
Maulana Sabekti dan Risti Dwi Ramasari. (2024). “Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menolak Gugatan Pembatalan Perkawinan (Studi Putusan Nomor 1109/Pdt.G/2023/PA.TNK)”. Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary. 2(2). https://doi.org/10.57235/jerumi.v2i2.2163.
Muhammad Haka Rahman Hakim dan Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi N. (2019). “Salah Sangka dan Penipuan Pada Pasal 27 Ayat (2) UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Jo. Pasal 72 Ayat (2) Kompilasi Hukum Islam Tentang Perkawinan”. Jurnal Privat Law. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v7i1.29962.
Muhammad Jazil Rifqi. (2019). “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pemalsuan Identitas dalam Pembatalan Perkawinan” Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah. 11(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v11i2.7297.
Pandu Dewanto. (2020). “Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Berbasis Nilai Keadilan”. Jurnal Ius Constituendum. 5(2).
Rizka Putri Awwaliyah (et.al.). (2023). “Kepastian Hukum Anak Perkawinan Campuran Akibat Pemalsuan Dokumen Perkawinan (Studi Kasus Perkawinan Jessica Iskandar dan Ludwig)”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik. 1(4). https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v1i4.1481.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Amandemen Ke IV.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan Sebagaimana Diperbaharui Oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Other Sources
Decision of the Religious Court of Purwokerto Number 182/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Pwt.
Decision of the Religious Court of Bantul Number 1577/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Btl.
Interview with Drs. H. Ohan Suherman, S.H., M.H., Chairman of the Fatwa Commission of the Indonesian Ulema Council of West Java, on Wednesday, November 20, 2024.
Interview with Dra. Hj. Imas Salamah, M.H., Judge of the Religious Court of Bandung, on Friday, November 29, 2024.