Articles

Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Perusahaan atas Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup dalam Tujuan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS): Perbandingan Indonesia dan Uni Eropa

    Authors

  • Muhammad Fadhil Sofyan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nusa Putra, Sukabumi, Indonesia
  • Nuchraha Alhuda Hasnda Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nusa Putra, Sukabumi, Indonesia
Published 2026-06-09
Section Articles

Abstract

ABSTRAK
Pencemaran lingkungan hidup akibat aktivitas perusahaan masih menjadi persoalan serius dalam mewujudkan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Permasalahan hukumnya terletak pada belum optimalnya pertanggungjawaban hukum perusahaan dalam mencegah dan memulihkan kerusakan lingkungan, khususnya di Indonesia. Penelitian terdahulu umumnya membahas tanggung jawab korporasi atau hukum lingkungan secara terpisah, sedangkan kajian yang menghubungkan pertanggungjawaban perusahaan dengan tujuan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) melalui perbandingan Indonesia dan Uni Eropa masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis harmonisasi keadilan lingkungan dan pembangunan dalam hukum internasional serta membandingkan pengaturan pertanggungjawaban hukum perusahaan atas pencemaran lingkungan hidup di Indonesia dan Uni Eropa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Temuan penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa Indonesia telah memiliki dasar pengaturan yang cukup lengkap, namun Uni Eropa lebih efektif karena menerapkan model yang preventif, restoratif, dan terintegrasi.
Kata kunci: pertanggungjawaban hukum perusahaan; pencemaran lingkungan; pembangunan berkelanjutan; sustainable development goals (SDGs); uni eropa.

ABSTRACT
Environmental pollution caused by corporate activities remains a serious issue in achieving sustainable development. The legal problem lies in the fact that corporate legal liability has not yet functioned optimally in preventing and remedying environmental damage, particularly in Indonesia. Previous studies generally examine corporate liability or environmental law separately, while studies linking corporate liability to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through a comparison between Indonesia and the European Union remain limited. This study aims to analyze the harmonization of environmental justice and development in international law and to compare the regulation of corporate legal liability for environmental pollution in Indonesia and the European Union. This study applies a normative juridical method through statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that Indonesia already has a relatively comprehensive legal framework, but the European Union is more effective because it applies a preventive, restorative, and integrated model.
Keywords: corporate legal liability; environmental pollution; sustainable development; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); European Union.

    Keywords

  • pertanggungjawaban hukum perusahaan
  • pencemaran lingkungan
  • pembangunan berkelanjutan
  • sustainable development goals (sdgs)
  • uni eropa

References

  1. Buku
  2. Ashford, Nicholas A.; Caldart, Charles C. Environmental Law, Policy, and Economics: Reclaiming the Environmental Agenda. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
  3. Bosselmann, Klaus. The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553955.
  4. Elisa Morgera. Corporate Environmental Accountability in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  5. EU Environmental Law. Ludwig Krämer. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2016.
  6. Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger and Ashfaq Khalfan. Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practices, and Prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  7. Nicolas de Sadeleer. “Environmental Principles: From Political Slogans to Legal Rules, 2nd,” hlm. 131–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
  8. Sachs, Jeffrey D. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.
  9. Sands, Philippe; Peel, Jacqueline. Principles of International Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  10. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
  11. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  12. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on Environmental Liability with Regard to the Prevention and Remedying of Environmental Damage, 2004.
  13. Jurnal/Artikel
  14. Andri G. Wibisana. “Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Untuk Kebakaran Hutan/Lahan: Beberapa Pelajaran Dari Menteri Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan (KLHK) vs. PT. Bumi Mekar Hijau (BMH).” Jurnal Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol 1, no. 1 (2016): hlm.36-58. https://doi.org/10.24970/jbhl.v1n1.4.
  15. Asrizal. “Reduksionisme AMDAL Dan Ancaman Deteriorasi Lingkungan: Perspektif Pembangunan Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Lex Renaissance 7, no. 2 (2022): 325–339. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss2.art8.
  16. Basuki, Tyas Mutiara; Indrawati, Dewi Retna; Nugroho, Hunggul Yudono Setio Hadi; Pramono, Irfan Budi; Setiawan, Ogi; Nugroho, Nunung Puji; Nada, Firda Maftukhakh Hilmya; Nandini, Ryke; Savitri, Endang; Adi, Rahardyan Nugroho; Purwanto; Sartohadi, Junun. “Water Pollution of Some Major Rivers in Indonesia: The Status, Institution, Regulation, and Recommendation for Its Mitigation.” Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 33, no. 4 (2024): 3515–3530. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/178532.
  17. Dewi Fitria Sari Anggaraini. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup (Studi Kasus Kebakaran Lahan PT Adei Plantation & Industry).” Jurnal RechtsVinding Vol 5, no. 2 (2016): hlm.1-15.
  18. Eccles, Robert G.; Ioannou, Ioannis; Serafeim, George. “The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance.” Management Science 60, no. 11 (2014): 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984.
  19. Emilio Padilla. “Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability.” Ecological Economics 41 (2002): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00026-5.
  20. Faure, Michael. “Environmental Liability of Companies in Europe.” Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 39, no. 1 (2022): 3–146. https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/89526289/03_39.1_Faure_Final_.pdf.
  21. Gupta, Joyeeta; Vegelin, Courtney. “Sustainable Development Goals and Inclusive Development.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16, no. 3 (2016): 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z.
  22. Hein, Lars; Spadaro, Joseph V.; Ostro, Bart; Hammer, Melanie; Sumarga, Elham; Salmayenti, Resti; Boer, Rizaldi; Tata, Hesti; Atmoko, Dwi; Castañeda, Juan-Pablo. “The Health Impacts of Indonesian Peatland Fires.” Environmental Health 21 (2022): 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00872-w.
  23. Helmi. “Strict Liability Dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 22, no. 2 (2015): 228–246. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss2.art4.
  24. Jacobs, Michael. “Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept.” In Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice, edited by Andrew Dobson. Oxford, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198294891.003.0002.
  25. Johan Rockström; Will Steffen; Kevin Noone; Åsa Persson; F. Stuart Chapin III; Eric F. Lambin; Timothy M. Lenton; Marten Scheffer; Carl Folke; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber; Björn Nykvist; Cynthia A. de Wit; Terry Hughes; Sander van der Leeuw; Henning Rodhe; “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461, no. 7263 (2009): 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
  26. Khaidar, Naufal; Nurrahman, David Baniardy; Mubarak, Teunku Ahmad Zaki. “The Effectiveness of Administrative Sanctions Against Environmental Pollution Cases in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development 2, no. 2 (2023): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v2i2.66150.
  27. Klaus Bosselmann. “Losing the Forest for the Trees: Environmental Reductionism in the Law,.” Sustainability 2, no. 8 (2010): 2424–2448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082424.
  28. Lee, Maria. “Environmental Liability and Preventive Regulation.” Modern Law Review 74, no. 6 (2011): 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00874.x.
  29. Louis J. Kotzé & Duncan French. “The Anthropocentric Ontology of International Environmental Law and the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards an Ecocentric Rule of Law in the Anthropocene.” Global Journal of Comparative Law 7 1 (2018): 11–18.
  30. Neil Gunningham, Robert A. Kagan, dan Dorothy Thornton. “Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance.” Law & Social Inquiry 29, no. 2 (2004): 307–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb00338.x.
  31. Ostrom, Elinor. “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Science 325 (2009): 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
  32. Pelengkahu, Muhammad Rahjay; Satria, Najib. “The Role of Environmental Legal Instruments and Government Policies in Realizing Sustainable Development in Indonesia.” Administrative and Environmental Law Review 4, no. 2 (2023): 127–138. https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v4i2.2971.
  33. Redclift, Michael. “Sustainable Development (1987–2005): An Oxymoron Comes of Age.” Sustainable Development 13, no. 4 (2005): 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281.
  34. Sadeleer, Nicolas de. “He Polluter-Pays Principle in EU Law – Bold Case Law and Poor Harmonisation.” In Pro Natura: Festskrift Til Hans Christian Bugge På 70-Årsdagen 2. Mars 2012, edited by Christina Backer, Inge Lorange; Fauchald, Ole Kristian; Voigt, 405–419. Universitetsforlaget, 2012.
  35. Steffen, Will; Broadgate, Wendy; Deutsch, Lisa; Gaffney, Owen; Ludwig, Cornelia. “The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration.” The Anthropocene Review 2, no. 1 (2015): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785.
  36. Wulandari, Retno; Iswara, Aditya Prana; Qadafi, Muammar; Prayogo, Wisnu; Astuti, Ratna Dwi Puji; Utami, Rosetyati Retno; Jayanti, Merri; Awfa, Dion; Suryawan, I. Wayan Koko; Fitria, Laili; Andhikaputra, Gerry. “Water Pollution and Sanitation in Indonesia: A Review on Water Quality, Health and Environmental Impacts, Management, and Future Challenges.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31, no. 58 (2024): 65967–65992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35567-x.
  37. Yulianti, Wida. “Corporations and Environmental Crimes: A Legal Analysis of Criminal Liability in Indonesia.” Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review 5, no. 2 (2024): 1405–1433. https://doi.org/10.15294/lsr.v5i2.25691.
  38. Sumber Lain
  39. European Commission. “Environmental Liability Directive (ELD), European Commission.” Accessed June 4, 2026. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/law-and-governance/environmental-compliance-assurance/environmental-liability_en.
  40. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. “Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Gakkum KLHK Tahun 2024.” Direktorat Jenderal Gakkum KLHK, 2024. https://gakkum.menlhk.go.id.
  41. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. “Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024.” Kementerian PPN/Bappenas, 2020. https://www.bappenas.go.id.
  42. United Nations. “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Accessed March 18, 2026. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
  43. Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (WALHI). “Tinjauan Lingkungan Hidup 2023 (Terdepan Di Luar Lintasan).” WALHI, 2023. https://www.walhi.or.id/tinjauan-lingkungan-hidup-2023-terdepan-di-luar-lintasan.
  44. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. “2024 Environmental Performance Index.” Environmental Performance Index, 2024. https://epi.yale.edu.
Issue Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): LITRA Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Tata Ruang dan Agraria, Volume 6, Nomor 1, Oktober 2026

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Fadhil Sofyan, Nuchraha Alhuda Hasnda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.